Talk:Armor customization (Halo 3)
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Redoing the tables[edit]
I am planning to redesign the tables for the list of armor permutations. Before I proceed, what type of layout should the table be? Should it remain in its current form or could it be redesign using an infobox-style look (like this for example). Note that this will be carried out for the Halo: Reach, Halo 4 and future articles (if they continue having armor customisation as a feature). Also note that images will only be used for the Halo 3 article but not other armor permutation articles. — subtank 11:02, 1 August 2013 (EDT)
- I like the format we are using for the Mark VI article. It's clean, simple and just looks the best in my opinion.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 12:03, 1 August 2013 (EDT)
- I think the infobox-style could be useful if the game's descriptions were added. There are often articles with "Halo 3 armor description" or "Halo: Reach armor description" as sources, but most of the time the description itself is absent from Halopedia. (Though there are some exceptions, such as the Halo 4 descriptions in some articles) It would also be easier to check the source, and could be useful to players who haven't unlocked everything. Imrane-117 (talk) 12:11, 1 August 2013 (EDT)
- Righty. I'll get on it before weekend. :) — subtank 09:46, 13 August 2013 (EDT)
- I think the infobox-style could be useful if the game's descriptions were added. There are often articles with "Halo 3 armor description" or "Halo: Reach armor description" as sources, but most of the time the description itself is absent from Halopedia. (Though there are some exceptions, such as the Halo 4 descriptions in some articles) It would also be easier to check the source, and could be useful to players who haven't unlocked everything. Imrane-117 (talk) 12:11, 1 August 2013 (EDT)
So, all done. Moving on to Halo 4's. Skipping Reach since they are all over the place!! :O — subtank 11:17, 17 August 2013 (EDT)
- On second thought, I think I'll just leave Halo 4 as it is as well since the wiki does not have a complete screenshot collection of the skins, legs and forearms. — subtank 11:34, 17 August 2013 (EDT)