Talk:Primordial
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
I am just wondering but did the name prisoner of charum hakkor come from Cryptum or was it just a speculative type name?#@lof@n1234-Forgive My English 20:33, 12 March 2011 (EST)
- It's referred to as the "prisoner of Charum Hakkor" on at least one occasion, so it isn't an entirely speculative name. However, it is simply called "the prisoner" throughout most of the novel. --"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson 20:46, 12 March 2011 (EST)
I think it would be more accurate to say "Unknown precursor", "Unknown Precursor prisoner" or something like that. But the name itself would be a huge spoiler to anybody who has not yet read Halo: Cryptum. Vegerot (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2011 (EST)!!
Rename?
What if we renamed it to the Timeless One?#@lof@n1234-Forgive My English 21:26, 12 March 2011 (EST)
Support I think it would be a good change! Vegerot (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2011 (EST)!!!
Support name makes more sense#@lof@n1234-Forgive My English 22:17, 12 March 2011 (EST)
Support - Since it's the only title that explicitly refers to the Precursor himself. "Prisoner of Charum Hakkor" sounds a little generic, imo. 
/ / STRYKER [ COM | LOG/M | LOG/S | AAU/HUM ] 20:36, 14 March 2011 (EDT)
Merge with Gravemind?
Since the Timeless One was revealed to be the Gravemind in Primordium, should they be merged together? Guest-10:15, 7 January 2012 (EST)
- No, since he himself was still a Precursor at one point.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs
- Also, we don't know how the Graveminds' minds work, if each one is a different "being" (best word I can think of), or if every time there's a Gravemind it's the same one coming back. If we learn for sure it's always the same, then we could merge them. Alex T Snow 18:59, 7 January 2012 (EST)