Talk:Infinity-class warship: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:34, October 12, 2012

Until we know that there's more than one vessel of the Infinity-class in the fleet or under construction, we should merge this class article into the lead ship's. The USS Enterprise (CVN-65) article on Wikipedia is set up much the same as it was slated to be the lead ship in a class of six carriers. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Any peeps before I merge the two pages? Last chance! Grizzlei ♥ ツ

Dunno. The bulletin definitely specifies that it is a warship class. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 16:29, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

Yeah I know that, its just that we don't know if there's any more ships in the class yet. It took a couple decades to build just one vessel and it would have been unreasonable given the dialogue in Glasslands and Thursday War that they were actively constructing additional hulls in 2552/2553. Until we know for certain that there's more than one, we really don't need a separate class article. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Any peeps before I merge the two pages? Last chance! {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}}
 Dunno. The bulletin definitely specifies that it ''is'' a warship class. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 16:29, 12 October 2012 (EDT)
+:Yeah I know that, its just that we don't know if there's any more ships in the class yet. It took a couple decades to build just one vessel and it would have been unreasonable given the dialogue in ''Glasslands'' and ''Thursday War'' that they were actively constructing additional hulls in 2552/2553. Until we know for certain that there's more than one, we really don't need a separate class article. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}}