Talk:Hunt the Truth: Difference between revisions

Line 54:

::Yeah I guess it deserves it's own page. I made the subsection not knowing how much info we were going to get. Though I will be putting it under Hunt the Truth in the list of appearances sections like I did for the trailers.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 18:54, 15 May 2015 (EDT)

:::If ~~it gets to~~ the ~~point where it~~ can't be covered sufficiently, then yes, it should have its own ~~article~~.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:15, 15 May 2015 (EDT)

:::If the topic can't be covered sufficiently in this article, then yes, it should have its own separate page.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:17, 15 May 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:15, May 15, 2015 (edit) Spartacus (talk \| contribs) (→‎Hunt the Signal worth its own page?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:16, May 15, 2015 (edit) (undo) Spartacus (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Hunt the Signal worth its own page?) Newer edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:

	::Yeah I guess it deserves it's own page. I made the subsection not knowing how much info we were going to get. Though I will be putting it under Hunt the Truth in the list of appearances sections like I did for the trailers.[[User:Sith Venator\|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg\|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator\|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 18:54, 15 May 2015 (EDT)		::Yeah I guess it deserves it's own page. I made the subsection not knowing how much info we were going to get. Though I will be putting it under Hunt the Truth in the list of appearances sections like I did for the trailers.[[User:Sith Venator\|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg\|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator\|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 18:54, 15 May 2015 (EDT)
	:::If ~~it gets to~~ the ~~point where it~~ can't be covered sufficiently, then yes, it should have its own ~~article~~.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:15, 15 May 2015 (EDT)		:::If the topic can't be covered sufficiently in this article, then yes, it should have its own separate page.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:17, 15 May 2015 (EDT)