Template talk:Deleted Material: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
NightHammer (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT) | ::Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::That makes a lot of sense. I'd be okay with that.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 17:47, 24 August 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:47, August 24, 2015
About removing deleted canon material
I'm not going to edit the template just yet, but I personally disagree with removing deleted material that has since been canonized. While the material in question may have been canonized in a novel or other media, it doesn't change the fact that the material never made it into the final version of a game. For that reason, it still falls under deleted content, it has just since been canonized in later media.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 13:18, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- I concur with the above. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 14:06, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT)