Talk:UNSC Song of the East: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:With the exception of graphical upgrades and artistic licenses, these cruisers are nearly identical to the refitted ''Pillar of Autumn''. Additionally, all ''Halcyon''-class light cruisers were decommissioned as the war progressed. The data presumably provided by Cortana on the Autumn's successes at Reach and Installation 04 would have led Fleet Command to fund a project to make these ships active again, especially to escort their expensive new flagship. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}} | :With the exception of graphical upgrades and artistic licenses, these cruisers are nearly identical to the refitted ''Pillar of Autumn''. Additionally, all ''Halcyon''-class light cruisers were decommissioned as the war progressed. The data presumably provided by Cortana on the Autumn's successes at Reach and Installation 04 would have led Fleet Command to fund a project to make these ships active again, especially to escort their expensive new flagship. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}} | ||
::Or, 343i reused the POA design from ''Reach'', polished the textures and 'upping' the polygons for the CGI scenes. Unless it can be shown what Grizzlei says is true, I would suggest we remove these conjecture information.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 21:40, 29 December 2012 (EST) | ::Or, 343i reused the POA design from ''Reach'', polished the textures and 'upping' the polygons for the CGI scenes. Unless it can be shown what Grizzlei says is true, I would suggest we remove these conjecture information.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 21:40, 29 December 2012 (EST) | ||
It would be utterly useless to have a non-upgraded Halcyon escort the ''Infinity''. They had virtually no offensive power. They wouldn't be useful in a defense role without upgrades. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 21:47, 29 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 22:47, December 29, 2012
Refit?
Where is the evidence that this ship had the same refit as the POA?—This unsigned comment was made by 108.66.164.104 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
- With the exception of graphical upgrades and artistic licenses, these cruisers are nearly identical to the refitted Pillar of Autumn. Additionally, all Halcyon-class light cruisers were decommissioned as the war progressed. The data presumably provided by Cortana on the Autumn's successes at Reach and Installation 04 would have led Fleet Command to fund a project to make these ships active again, especially to escort their expensive new flagship. Grizzlei ♥ ツ
- Or, 343i reused the POA design from Reach, polished the textures and 'upping' the polygons for the CGI scenes. Unless it can be shown what Grizzlei says is true, I would suggest we remove these conjecture information.— subtank 21:40, 29 December 2012 (EST)
It would be utterly useless to have a non-upgraded Halcyon escort the Infinity. They had virtually no offensive power. They wouldn't be useful in a defense role without upgrades. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 21:47, 29 December 2012 (EST)