Talk:Halo: A Fistful of Arrows

An issue

People gonna hate me for this, but this needs to be addressed. No doubt, there is an insurmountable significance when asked the notability. However, the question is not focused on notability, but rather on the floodgate issue: what can we do to avoid waves of unnecessary fan-made content added onto Halopedia. Thus, to what extent are we gonna allow fan-made content on this wiki? There needs to be a limit or some kind of guideline that sets what is permitted and what is not.

A few notes to remind others: Halopedia focuses only on official content with a few of fan-made ones that was published alongside official products (i.e. Warthog Jump game featured on HBO, which is also featured on H3 special disc). The wiki does focus on community sites such as Rampancy.net, HBO and Halomaps.org, but community site is a category not interchangeable with content such as literary/artistic/animation works. Certain fan-made content such as Oonsk has been removed from Halopedia as it was forced popularity, while others such as Mister Chief was allowed since they were created by members of the officials.

And yes, I am aware that I've created a few in the past.— subtank 10:00, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

Same as we've done in the past: only keep the most popular of the popular and reputable of the reputable on Halopedia. If I remember correctly, Red vs. Blue, Arby 'n' the Chief, and Operation Chastity are the only significant fan-made content articles here on Halopedia at the moment. Don't see why we should give up that stance now. Saying that however, as with previous fan made works, I still believe that the content allowed for these articles should be extremely limited to the status of the work; the most I personally would allow for A Fistful of Arrows would be this article, maybe one highlighting Levi's work, and perhaps a little mention in Jun-A266's trivia section. Oh, and we do hate you. :P User:CommanderTony/Sig

Red vs Blue has a pseudo-official status; they were mentioned/previewed in H3's special edition package. The other two, like you said, is of special status for being widely popular.

Oh, the hatred... :( — subtank 10:16, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

Well even if it isn't as popular as Red vs. Blue or other works, the content of his work is merit enough to award such an article. Especially when so many people feel so highly about its content and their views towards it. Who knows....maybe this is what 343i needs to push it into canon [dreaming, quite doubtful :)] User:CommanderTony/Sig

What Tony said. And yes, we can dream of such a wonderful thing... - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 10:40, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

Then comes the writer of this page: Actually, there are 17 (1*7 = 7 :o) materials here on Halopedia. In my opinion, most of these articles are probably first written by people who really, really, really enjoyed that fan-made material. To be honest, I really, really, really did enjoy this comic. But, if this will unlock the Flood research facility, I will not mind deleting this page, and absolutely not hate anyone for it. Maybe we can set a policy, that only fan-made materials mentioned by 343i or Bungie is notable enough, but that may seem too harsh. Sorry for not asking permission before starting this page. I remember there was a discussion on this before, somewhere. —S331 _{(Tank beats Everything!)} 10:47, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

While our main focus is undoubtedly on official content, I have no problem with the wiki documenting the most exceptional and well-known fan works. As for notability, I think it should be judged individually on a case-by-case basis, and common sense, overall popularity, even official recognition should be enough to determine whether the subject deserves its own page. If we start contesting the notability of A Fistful of Arrows, I personally think it's way more notable than something like Halo: Faith or Operation Chastity - as far as I can tell, there isn't even a trailer out for either of the films so far. Meanwhile, A Fistful of Arrows has been recognized by both Bungie and 343i more than once, not to mention being hugely popular, well-known and overwhelmingly well received across the community. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 11:07, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

It's not an issue of notability as much as it is an issue of opening the floodgate; they all satisfy that worthiness requirement but the popularity element needs to be assessed (i.e. is it forced upon). But you pretty much summed up what I want to say. :) — subtank 11:22, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

As per Jugus. I haven't seen too many other cases where "hordes" of people have tried to push fan-made content onto this wiki, save for their own fanfiction, so I think it should still be easy enough to tell anyway following this which are notable and which are not, and that we shouldn't worry about a "slippery slope." Looking at the Fan-made category, some of the mentioned seem less than notable, (but that might be a consequence of time or keeping up with the news) at least less notable than this fellow discussed here. Because it HAS been recognized by Bungie and 343. A LOT. Something like say, Company 0051? Still popular, but less noted by the developers, therefore it stays off. (Sorry Jameson.) Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 11:26, 2 November 2011 (EDT)