Category talk:Reptiles: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is this category really necessary? It's odd to me that Sangheili and Kig-Yar are in this odd category... Especially since we're using 'reptile' [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 11:35, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | Is this category really necessary? It's odd to me that Sangheili and Kig-Yar are in this odd category... Especially since we're using 'reptile' [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 11:35, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Well, they are reptiles. Just like humans are mammals. - [[User:HaRi III|Hari III]] | :Well, they are reptiles. Just like humans are mammals. - [[User:HaRi III|Hari III]] | ||
::Well, we have a [[:Category:Flying | ::Well, we have a [[:Category:Flying species|birds]] category, so having one for reptiles doesn't hurt. Plus, it offers a way to sub-categorise animals, which helps to keep the animals category from filling up more.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 14:08, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::In truth, I made the category think that there was more reptiles, but I guess it's still enough to warrant a category. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 14:28, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | :::In truth, I made the category think that there was more reptiles, but I guess it's still enough to warrant a category. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 14:28, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, September 9, 2021
Necessary?[edit]
Is this category really necessary? It's odd to me that Sangheili and Kig-Yar are in this odd category... Especially since we're using 'reptile' Erickyboo (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
- Well, they are reptiles. Just like humans are mammals. - Hari III
- Well, we have a birds category, so having one for reptiles doesn't hurt. Plus, it offers a way to sub-categorise animals, which helps to keep the animals category from filling up more.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 14:08, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
- In truth, I made the category think that there was more reptiles, but I guess it's still enough to warrant a category. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 14:28, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
- Well, we have a birds category, so having one for reptiles doesn't hurt. Plus, it offers a way to sub-categorise animals, which helps to keep the animals category from filling up more.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 14:08, 18 September 2015 (EDT)