Template talk:Human sidearms: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Curious question== | ==Curious question== | ||
Why is this template ( | Why is this template (Template:UNSC sidearms) and that template (Template:UNSC_rifles) separate? | ||
While all the Covenant weaponry are under one template.( | While all the Covenant weaponry are under one template.(Template:Covenant Weapons) | ||
Wouldn't it be easier to merge them together and create a Template:UNSC Weapons? This would actually help the editors and normal users, navigate the UNSC weapons. I wouldn't ask this if the Covenant did the same, but it doesnt. - [[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:09, 3 March 2016 (GMT) | Wouldn't it be easier to merge them together and create a Template:UNSC Weapons? This would actually help the editors and normal users, navigate the UNSC weapons. I wouldn't ask this if the Covenant did the same, but it doesnt. - [[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:09, 3 March 2016 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:47, March 25, 2018
Curious question[edit]
Why is this template (Template:UNSC sidearms) and that template (Template:UNSC_rifles) separate?
While all the Covenant weaponry are under one template.(Template:Covenant Weapons)
Wouldn't it be easier to merge them together and create a Template:UNSC Weapons? This would actually help the editors and normal users, navigate the UNSC weapons. I wouldn't ask this if the Covenant did the same, but it doesnt. - CIA391 (talk) 20:09, 3 March 2016 (GMT)
- IIRC, all the weapons used to be on one template, but were then separated into those categories because the template was becoming too cluttered to look good on an article. Overall, I feel it's more organized this way. Covenant weapons should be like this as well.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 16:14, 3 March 2016 (EST)
- Agreed. I think another reason is that there isn't (or wasn't) enough Covenant weapons to warrant multiple templates. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 16:15, 3 March 2016 (EST)