Talk:RECRUIT-class Mjolnir: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


Previously, Halo's multiplayer armor permutations were purely aesthetic in nature (obviously), but now I can see through recent games, in my opinion pretty much from ''ODST'' and onward, that 343i, and Bungie before it, are focusing on more of a direct/functional approach instead of a "hey that looks cool" look. In other words if it can do its intended job and look smug in the process, then so be it. Not a fashion show. '''-[[User:Killjax|Killjax]]'''
Previously, Halo's multiplayer armor permutations were purely aesthetic in nature (obviously), but now I can see through recent games, in my opinion pretty much from ''ODST'' and onward, that 343i, and Bungie before it, are focusing on more of a direct/functional approach instead of a "hey that looks cool" look. In other words if it can do its intended job and look smug in the process, then so be it. Not a fashion show. '''-[[User:Killjax|Killjax]]'''
== Pre-Order Exclusive? ==
I remember reading that this armor was exclusive to Limited Edition owners, but this page doesn't say anything about that. Is it exclusive or not? --[[User:Delta1138|Delta1138]] [[User_talk:Delta1138|SnooPING AS usual I see]] 12:34, 25 September 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:34, September 25, 2012

Normal

I know this is not what talk pages are for, but is anyone else happy to see at least one armour set that looks normal? Alex T Snow 19:17, 24 August 2012 (EDT)

Previously, Halo's multiplayer armor permutations were purely aesthetic in nature (obviously), but now I can see through recent games, in my opinion pretty much from ODST and onward, that 343i, and Bungie before it, are focusing on more of a direct/functional approach instead of a "hey that looks cool" look. In other words if it can do its intended job and look smug in the process, then so be it. Not a fashion show. -Killjax

Pre-Order Exclusive?

I remember reading that this armor was exclusive to Limited Edition owners, but this page doesn't say anything about that. Is it exclusive or not? --Delta1138 SnooPING AS usual I see 12:34, 25 September 2012 (EDT)