Talk:Ancestors: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(→Human-Forerunner war: new section) |
|||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
::Yeah... just sounds a little odd as a title for a page about a civilization. Might work though. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:35, 11 November 2014 (EST) | ::Yeah... just sounds a little odd as a title for a page about a civilization. Might work though. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 12:35, 11 November 2014 (EST) | ||
== Human-Forerunner war == | |||
Did prehistoric humanity lose the war due to being stretched thin from fighting against the Flood (which the page kinda implies), or were the Forerunners simply vastly superior to them? From what I gathered prehistoric humanity loss every direct confrontation with the mighty Forerunners and were only able to stand a ghost of a chance against them by reverse engineering Forerunner tech and using Precursor structures as defenses. To say that prehistoric humanity was close to or on the same level as the Forerunners is an insult to the Gods!!! |
Revision as of 23:38, December 18, 2014
Considering it took us roughly 100,000 years to go from Tier 7 to Tier 3 (26th century), that must mean that the human race appeared roughly 200,000 years ago in order for us to have reached Tier 3 in the past. Does this hold up with our real-world current knowledge of human pre-history? Basically, was there enough time to become space-faring?--File:PENGUIN4.gifFluffyEmoPenguin(ice quack!) 17:11, 2 January 2011 (EST)
- I don't think the humans that ventured out into the galaxy would be recognisable as such today, at least not physically. The first Homo species diverge from Australopithecus around 2.4 or 2.3 million years ago, and archaic Homo sapiens appear between 400,000 and 250,000 years ago. Modern Homo sapiens has come a long way, but has done so sporadically - short bursts of advancement and occasional relapses back into barbarity, ie; the Dark Ages following the fall of the Roman Empire. I think the timeframe we have available leaves plenty of room for ancient humans to have built up a small interstellar empire. -- Specops306 Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek 17:38, 2 January 2011 (EST)
- The Forerunner known as "the Librarian" was able to control the human population, with people being programmed to seek her out. Perhaps the Precursors used a similar technology to program generations of Forerunners and humans to desire the improvement of their own technology - an ancient rennaisance. The Forerunners themselves suspected that both they and the humans had had their genes tampered with long ago by the Precursors to create an example of "convergent evolution".-- Forerunner 19:27, 2 January 2011 (EST)
I have to say I disagree with this statement "After forty thousand years of expansion" on the basis of what source does this come from? If it is being based on Halo Legends: The Babysitter because of the ancient ruins that resemble East Asian architecture then the statement is based on conjecture. It is never established if in fact those ruins were built by the Human Empire or not. Deep Reverence 16:30, 14 January 2011 (EST) Ya I mean how do we know it was never sourced#@lof@n1234 20:57, 30 January 2011 (EST)
- The novel says somewhere in the first two chapters that humanity had been space faring for 40,000 years before their war with the Forerunners.-- Forerunner 16:47, 14 January 2011 (EST)
Rename
- Strong Support. "Ancient" does not convey the appropriate time, and "prehistoric" is much more appropriate. -- Specops306 Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek 02:42, 9 January 2011 (EST)
- Support. Same here, of course. --"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson 11:12, 9 January 2011 (EST)
- Support, per Specops306. -- SFH 15:27, 9 January 2011 (EST)
De-evolved
I can’t help but noticed we have conflicting information on humanity’s de-evolving namely whether the Forerunners de-evolved us or not, I believe the Halopedia community needs to come to solid position over this - MCDBBlits 20:50, 30 January 2011 (EST)
- The Forerunners reduced past humanity to a more ancestral form, from which other variants were restored by the genetic manipulation and guidance of the Librarian - Florians, Neanderthals, modern humans, etc. I'm not entirely sure how that works, since Neanderthals appear in the fossil record before humanity supposedly achieved spaceflight, while Florians don't appear at all until after the activation of the Array, but hey, it's also lampshaded in the story, commenting that the human fossil record was completely mixed and jumpled by the process. -- Specops306 Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek 22:31, 30 January 2011 (EST)
- I'm aware of that but the point I was making was that on one page says that human were defeat and de-evolved on their own and on others it states that the Forerunners de-evolved us, and that we at Halopedia need to improve internal continuity or change all relevant pages to state that the Forerunner government de-evolved humanity but told their people that it happened naturally - MCDBBlits 17:25, 1 February 2011 (EST)
- The Forerunners de-evolved all humans including the florins to an early point in their history - MCDBBlits 19:33, 1 February 2011 (EST)
- Before the war, Humanity had the same appearance, this is stated early in the book ("When your people and mine looked the same" Riser and Chakas). Later, when Bornstellar is reflecting about the state of his race, he mentions the point about reducing their foes to lemurs, wondering how many times they had done this. This notion is supported not only statements, but also from the Forerunners ability to mutate their bodies into different rates. The technology, I do not doubt, was abused to reduced their foes into defenseless state.--Totem 02:57, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
Erda and Erde-tyrene
Is Erda and Erde-tyrene the same planet? From what I gathered in halo: primordium, they are 2 seperate planets. Am I wrong? - The Divine One
- Primordium made it very clear that they're one and the same - when Chakas tells Gamelpar about Erde-Tyrene, Gamelpar recognizes it as his homeworld and says his wife called it Erda. There's other examples later on, like the one cited in the article (page 238), where Forthencho alternates between the two names when describing Earth. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 13:00, 22 May 2012 (EDT)
Halo 4 and Ancient Humans
Hey anyone got screenshots of the ancient human ships from the 2nd terminal? those would be good to add.Flavius Aetius 17:12, 10 November 2012 (EST)
- I think we already do have a screenshot already. --Xamikaze330 (talk|contribs) 17:14, 10 November 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330
- Awesome Flavius Aetius 16:42, 11 November 2012 (EST)
- Hey could we possibly also post that Armor picture ont he Combat SKins page? In Halo 4 the Librarian says they use the same term for it in one of the terminals I think. Flavius Aetius 12:05, 13 November 2012 (EST)
- I hope you are referring to the Forerunner combat skin, and not the prehistoric human combat armor. Because technically, combat skin does not apply to non-Forerunner technology, such as the prehistoric human advanced combat armor seen in the Halo 4 terminals. --Xamikaze330 (talk|contribs) 12:16, 13 November 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330
Planet Heian and PHC Culture
could we add info on the ruins of Heian to this article? The article on Heian states that its ruins are of PHC origin. The ruins on Heian display alot of what PHC culture is like, which seems to be a hybrid of Greco-Roman, Middle Eastern and East Asian cultures. --C0mbust4bl3L3m0nz (talk|contribs) 5:33, 22 December 2012 (EST)C0mbust4bl3L3m0nz
- Already added. Read this section. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 20:47, 22 December 2012 (EST)
Concept Art Human Ships
Does anyone else notice that some of the human ship designs in the concept art were repurposed for Forerunner ships in the terminals particularly Terminal 2 and 6. Compare them and you see it.
"Ancient humans"
The Waypoint Universe encyclopedia conclusively identifies the humanity of this era as being referred to as "ancient humans" (as in, not just a descriptor). Not the most original or specific name they could've come up with, but it's something. Should we call this page "ancient human" (in line with the title of the Human page, focusing on the species in particular) or "ancient humanity" (which I prefer)? --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 10:47, 10 November 2014 (EST)
- For simplicity sake, I would go for the former.— subtank 10:57, 10 November 2014 (EST)
Human-Forerunner war
Did prehistoric humanity lose the war due to being stretched thin from fighting against the Flood (which the page kinda implies), or were the Forerunners simply vastly superior to them? From what I gathered prehistoric humanity loss every direct confrontation with the mighty Forerunners and were only able to stand a ghost of a chance against them by reverse engineering Forerunner tech and using Precursor structures as defenses. To say that prehistoric humanity was close to or on the same level as the Forerunners is an insult to the Gods!!!