898
edits
Talk:Sangheili/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
m
→Rank reorganisation
TheLostJedi (talk | contribs) |
TheLostJedi (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 666: | Line 666: | ||
:::This may be a stretch, but perhaps they hold both titles of "Zealot" and "Field Master", whilst "General" is their actual rank. I come to this conclusion because the newer material Jugus mentions describes "Zealot" as more of an ideology than rank. Whilst the EVG and Encyclopedia appear to confirm General as a rank. Whilst I agree that "Ship Master" is likely just a title, as we've seen various ranking Elites assume the role... so perhaps "Field Master" is too? | :::This may be a stretch, but perhaps they hold both titles of "Zealot" and "Field Master", whilst "General" is their actual rank. I come to this conclusion because the newer material Jugus mentions describes "Zealot" as more of an ideology than rank. Whilst the EVG and Encyclopedia appear to confirm General as a rank. Whilst I agree that "Ship Master" is likely just a title, as we've seen various ranking Elites assume the role... so perhaps "Field Master" is too? | ||
:::It would mean that all golden Elites are in fact "Generals", whilst "Zealot", "Field Master" | :::It would mean that all golden Elites are in fact "Generals", whilst "Zealot", "Field Master" and "Ship Master", (and possibly "Fleet Master" and "Supreme Commander") are all titles which can be more loosely applied. Imperial Admiral and Field Marshal are obviously ranks of their own. The only issue would be that the Zealot-subset in Halo: Reach, below Field Marshals lack an actual rank name. Though that still doesn't exactly make this theory invalid. I can't see any glarish flaws in this reasoning anyway. Can you guys? I'm just trying to make sense of it all hehe. -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 23:14, 8 November 2011 (EST) | ||
== Arent humans strategically better than Sangheili. == | == Arent humans strategically better than Sangheili. == | ||