22,591
edits
Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media: Difference between revisions
m
Porplemontage moved page Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the Media to Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media
Dragonclaws (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Porplemontage moved page Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the Media to Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT) | Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:Having newer entries at the bottom comes across as more logical to me, so I would vote changing the instruction. --[[User:Tacitus|Tacitus]] ([[User talk:Tacitus|talk]]) 05:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::Yea I seem some wikis do the newest to oldest but tbh it just comes off as awkward at times. What Tacitus said, Oldest to newest, seems the better option. I mean we "could" do a thing where "only" the newest item gets put to the top so folks can see the most recent time we were mentioned, but thats pushing stuff.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 11:38, April 15, 2019 (EDT) | |||