Template talk:Deleted Material: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "w:c:halofanon:" to "halofanon:")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
:::That makes a lot of sense. I'd be okay with that.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 17:47, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
:::That makes a lot of sense. I'd be okay with that.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 17:47, 24 August 2015 (EDT)


:Deleted Material implies that it has ''never'' made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it ''was'' deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
:Deleted Material implies that it has ''never'' made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it ''was'' deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT)


==Game by game instead of what type of content==
==Game by game instead of what type of content==
Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
:I agree. If necessary, we could even implemented nested navboxes like what is used for the campaign/ multiplayer menus.[[User:BaconShelf|BaconShelf]] ([[User talk:BaconShelf|talk]]) 11:22, 28 August 2018 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:08, June 2, 2019

About removing deleted canon material[edit]

I'm not going to edit the template just yet, but I personally disagree with removing deleted material that has since been canonized. While the material in question may have been canonized in a novel or other media, it doesn't change the fact that the material never made it into the final version of a game. For that reason, it still falls under deleted content, it has just since been canonized in later media.--Spartacus TalkContribs 13:18, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

I concur with the above. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 14:06, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
That makes a lot of sense. I'd be okay with that.--Spartacus TalkContribs 17:47, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
Deleted Material implies that it has never made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it was deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

Game by game instead of what type of content[edit]

Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-CIA391 (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT)

I agree. If necessary, we could even implemented nested navboxes like what is used for the campaign/ multiplayer menus.BaconShelf (talk) 11:22, 28 August 2018 (EDT)