Talk:Planetary warfare: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (Text replacement - "w:c:halofanon:" to "halofanon:") |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Torn on whether to use [[:File:FoR_-_d%27Azur.jpg|this]], [[:File: | Torn on whether to use [[:File:FoR_-_d%27Azur.jpg|this]], this or [[:File:Annivesary, conflict.jpg|this]] image as the article lead. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 05:29, 6 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
|this]] | :If only [[:File:Concept-Deliver-Hope-1.jpg|this]] wasn't concept art. Anyway, I would choose the third image. It isn't incredibly ideal, but it does encapsulate planetary warfare very well. It even has the Flood there. -- [[User:Topal the Pilot|'''Topal the Pilot''']] [[File:Blueteam.png|20px]] <small>([[User talk:Topal the Pilot|<span style="color:green">'''Talk'''</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Topal the Pilot|<span style="color:green">'''Contribs'''</span>]])</small> 20:49, 6 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
|this]] | |||
:Just FYI, only you (and maybe Bureaucrats?) can edit the page since it's your user page. Maybe move it to Halopedia's Sandbox? --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 10:16, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
::Personally I like Topal's picture a lot. Otherwise I'll go with Morhek's third. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 10:43, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
:::Agreed. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 11:38, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
Note for future reference: [[MAKO-class Mjolnir|UNSC Army employs combat divers.]] --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 12:20, 7 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
:Looks good. I do agree that types of warfare may be useful, though. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 23:49, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
==Move to Namespace?== | |||
Besides the referencing, I'm liking how this turned out. My life is filled with caring for a toddler niece and helping her parents move right now, so I could use some help with the referencing. Would people recommend shifting the article before or after we finish that? -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 20:00, 16 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
:Probably would be better to wait after he have completed referencing. I can help a bit, but I'll be mostly busy with exams and other uni stuff until Friday. After that, I can be of more help. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 11:50, 17 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
Sorry about the referencing, guys. My brother's family are moving, so it's a bit of a hectic time for me. I do intend to move this to the namespace when I do, though I think I'll leave sections about specific types of warfare off - things like "civil war" or "total war" or "assymetric combat" are more appropriate on our [[War]] article. This is detailing the actual engagements themselves. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 06:23, 25 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
:Sounds good. I will work on referencing a bit tonight if I have time. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 19:15, 26 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:04, June 2, 2019
Torn on whether to use this, this or this image as the article lead. -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 05:29, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
- If only this wasn't concept art. Anyway, I would choose the third image. It isn't incredibly ideal, but it does encapsulate planetary warfare very well. It even has the Flood there. -- Topal the Pilot
(Talk|Contribs) 20:49, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
- Just FYI, only you (and maybe Bureaucrats?) can edit the page since it's your user page. Maybe move it to Halopedia's Sandbox? --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 10:16, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
- Personally I like Topal's picture a lot. Otherwise I'll go with Morhek's third. Imrane-117 (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
- Agreed. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 11:38, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
Note for future reference: UNSC Army employs combat divers. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 12:20, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Looks good. I do agree that types of warfare may be useful, though. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 23:49, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
Move to Namespace?[edit]
Besides the referencing, I'm liking how this turned out. My life is filled with caring for a toddler niece and helping her parents move right now, so I could use some help with the referencing. Would people recommend shifting the article before or after we finish that? -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 20:00, 16 April 2016 (EDT)
- Probably would be better to wait after he have completed referencing. I can help a bit, but I'll be mostly busy with exams and other uni stuff until Friday. After that, I can be of more help. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 11:50, 17 April 2016 (EDT)
Sorry about the referencing, guys. My brother's family are moving, so it's a bit of a hectic time for me. I do intend to move this to the namespace when I do, though I think I'll leave sections about specific types of warfare off - things like "civil war" or "total war" or "assymetric combat" are more appropriate on our War article. This is detailing the actual engagements themselves. -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 06:23, 25 April 2016 (EDT)
- Sounds good. I will work on referencing a bit tonight if I have time. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 19:15, 26 April 2016 (EDT)