23,074
edits
Forum:Designations: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::Actually, all infoboxes still retain the <code>name</code> field (available via <code>|name=</code>). It's just hidden from plain view due to the common issue of editors forgetting to update that field after renaming the articles. I made sure that all the basic field parameters are intact. ;) — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 23:46, 29 October 2012 (EDT) | ::::Actually, all infoboxes still retain the <code>name</code> field (available via <code>|name=</code>). It's just hidden from plain view due to the common issue of editors forgetting to update that field after renaming the articles. I made sure that all the basic field parameters are intact. ;) — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 23:46, 29 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:::::I did not know that (apparently)! I suppose that I need to refresh/cache clear more often or whatever. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}} | :::::I did not know that (apparently)! I suppose that I need to refresh/cache clear more often or whatever. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}} | ||
I actually support the idea of using common names for article titles like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_titles#Common_names Wikipedia does] since we're an encyclopedia and not a technical manual. This would at least be one consistent policy that applies to character names, weapons, vehicles, and everything else. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 23:53, 29 October 2012 (EDT) | |||