User talk:Cally99117/Archive
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
| Began Service: April 28, 2009 Gallery | Userboxes | Funny IRC Moments | Guestbook | Goals | Created pages Current Service: 18:38, 17 December, 2024 | |
|
Cally99117's talk page Archive list. | ||
| ||
Multiple Edits
Please note that making multiple edits in an article is an offense in Halopedia.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:52, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
Jun is older than seven, therefore he must have been seven at one point. The fact that in the context of the candidates ages five, six, AND seven are not distinguished as being any more important makes it a seven reference as much as it is a five and six reference. It's NOT. ApolloisNaughty 18:38, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Origins
Those are not characters from Halo Wars. They may look like them but Cortana narrates the episode chronologically, thus those people we saw are just random Captains from the early years (2300s-2400s).外国人(7alk) 17:39, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly. Besides, they don't even look like them. This was hundreds of years before their time. It's not them. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 17:49, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
What about when that covenant ship in Halo Wars:Genesis. it took ages to classify the ship it was. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
- What has that got to do with anything? - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 18:02, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
While I might not have the best knowledge on the situation of this, I'd like to ask all of you to cease edit warring and sort your disputes here, come to an agreement and then finalize your edits. If it doesn't stop, the articles will be locked. This is the only warning I'm giving. - File:Major.png|20px]] Nìcmávr (Tálk) 18:03, February 14, 2010 (UTC) No one comes to an agreement with me!. 7h3 Ma573r Chi3f (5par7an-117) (J0hn) (Ma573r Chi3f P377y 0ffic3r) 14:51, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- As a semi-vet user, I think you should follow up Nicmavr. Do not make pointless edit wars because that's when the admins lock articles and ban people. If you don't want to be banned, although I am not an admin I strongly suggest you just talk this over with whoever you're edit warring with and not continuing to revert their edits. S-984 18:27, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Red Team
Before you ask, I reverted your edit because there were four Spartans seen, Red Team only has three. It might be them, but we have no confirmation, or evidence to suggest so. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 13:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
That doesn't change anything but I am not going into an edit war with you. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
Mendicant Bias
I consolidated the Origins subsection since I wasn't sure which one to reply to. But as to my reason for being here, Frankie confirmed here that 05-032 Mendicant Bias was in Origins. Please stop deleting that sourced fact. Thank you. -- Lord Hyren 16:32, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
But he was defected to the flood after the the halos were built but the monitor that was seen in was before the halos were built I don't know why he confirmed it when it wasn't the truth. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
- Yet Frankie confirmed it, so what other choice do we have? He has had the Halo Bible in his possession at some time (I assume), so its our best bet to listen to him. -- General5 7 talk contribs email 15:00, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Origins AGAIN
I reverted it because this has been reverted several times before, because the term "Halo Array" covers all the Halos already, and having each individual one on the page just takes up space and messes things up. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 15:01, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Well if it does then revert all the other useless edits that are not just mine! And when has it been reverted several times before? When I added it you only moved them into different parts of the Characters Section. - SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
- I'm not picking on you, your edits just happen to fall under the criteria that require them to be reverted or deleted. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 15:08, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Edit Warring
I have blocked you again and again for constant reversion of edits without any type of dialog. If I block you again for the same offense, it will be for a very long time. This is my one and only warning to you. Stop the petty edit warring. SmokeSound off! 16:55, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
I don't get information on why my edits should be reverted. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
- Yes you do. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 17:02, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
- When someone reverts your edit, read their edit summary, that should tell you right there. El Ammo Bandito, "¡Para todas sus necesidades destructivas!" 17:04, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
- If for some reason you don't get information, you better start asking. SmokeSound off! 17:12, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Question
Is there any reason why you are reverting edits changing "Battle" to "Fall"?-- Forerunner 16:27, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Go here for the information. ----> Master Chief Petty Officer John-117 (Personal Favorite). 16:29, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Or how about...
You STFU and leave my talk page alone? Ajax 013 18:17, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Don't mess with people's pages for good reasons, k? And there are something called manners...-- General5 7 talk contribs email 21:18, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Why was Jugus removing red links on user pages while you don't want me to do it? And why are you so negative with me? --> My Page Talk Page Contributions Page All Edits Page Email Page (Favourite Page) (Opinion Page) 06:50, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Was Jugus telling some user to do something? No. He was merely removing red links, unlike you, who chose to order Ajax to do something. And to your last question, I am being negative because you act like everything you do is correct, with complete disregard to others. My advice to you (as I've said many times before), is get your damn attitude together. -- General5 7 talk contribs email 18:03, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- And yet you made a rude comment back? Phail. Quit playing innocent. -- General5 7 talk contribs email 18:16, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Since you are choosing yourself to react badly to my own comment (with the last part of my first message directed to both of you), I'm just going to close this argument. But keep that attitude up, and you may earn yourself a ban. This will be your first warning. -- General5 7 talk contribs email 18:21, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Cally, both you and Ajax are in the wrong. How about we just drop the argument before something bad happens. - Nìcmávr (Tálk) 18:24, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
sorry
Yeh I forgot that the plasma was fired when it needed to be shut down sorry about that -zephspacer-
RE: Species templates
First of all, I had no idea about that template's name. Personally, I see no reason for their name to be changed. First of all, the names of the templates themselves do not appear in the articles, so they have no need to be formalized. Additionally, look at this. We would want to make it titled "Halo 3 Medals" and make it more difficult when we don't? -- General5 7 talk contribs email 15:53, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Again see this. --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117
- If you're just going to put a link and tell me to look at it, then I will not switch sides. Do you not have an argument? General5 7 talk contribs email
“ | Just look at this and say that again. | ” |
- You sure didn't make that obvious. You might want to treat people with a little less attitude than you do now. General5 7 talk contribs email