Talk:Otto Seinmann

Untitled

Are you sure the CMA didn't later sell the Laden to a private owner? Unless something happened to it, haven't read the story so i really can't say. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 22:04, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm. That is a possibility, but we don't have any evidence to support them being the same ship. Besides, most often when a ship changes ownership it is renamed by its new owner. For now I think we just have to assume that they're different, especially since we have no idea what type of ship the CMA Laden was. It could have been anything from a freighter to a carrier.--Rusty-UserWiki:Rusty-112|112]] 22:08, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, But it seems like a huge continuity nod to FoR when Nylund actually gave it the same name. If he wanted to avoid confusion between the two, one would think he would've named it differently.--Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 22:15, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought that might be the case too; it would be pretty cool. Let's see what other people think before we go making a decision though.--Rusty-UserWiki:Rusty-112|112]] 22:19, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

There could be two ships with the same name. SgtSalty

Wrong

There is something wrong in the text, Seinman told Cole to double check his calculations but he didnt steal Coles calculations because Cole was working on it long after the slipspacejump. Nevel said that Seinmans calculations are rought long bevor he discovered that Cole was still working on something that Seinman ordered him to do. So Seinman is an a**hole but not a thief. Please read the textlines again and then improve this article. ElLoco

That's not exactly true. Seinmann's original intent was to have Cole do the work for him, but the AI Lorelei came back online before Cole finished and looked over what Seinmann had done before handing his work over to Cole.--Rusty-UserWiki:Rusty-112|112]] 17:29, December 14, 2009 (UTC)