Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| =='''Quick Guide to Formatting'''== | | ==Text bug?== |
| *Descriptions should be ''italicized''. Any important info that needs to be added such as "(grammar mistake is present on card)" should remain un-italicized to keep it separate from the description.
| | Why is "certifications" lit up blue like it is a link?--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 19:23, 19 September 2015 (EDT) |
| *This goes without saying, but double check spelling and grammar so the card description matches the in-game one perfectly.
| | |
| *Sale price category has been added, so it no longer bunks with the rarity.
| | |
| *Sorting/organization should be based on the order the cards appear in the collection. You can find the entirely list in order, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVfMGgXgeDQ here], courtesy of Ready Up Live. Keep in mind the order of cards appear in this format in the catalog:
| |
| {| class="wikitable" style="margin:2px auto; font-size:small; text-align:center; background:#FFFFFF"
| |
| |-
| |
| |1
| |
| |4
| |
| |7
| |
| |-
| |
| |2
| |
| |5
| |
| |8
| |
| |-
| |
| |3
| |
| |6
| |
| |9
| |
| |-
| |
| |} etc, etc.
| |
| *ALSO still holding out hope for a [[Timmy the Whale]] REQ card! O_O
| |
| ==A list already exists== | | ==A list already exists== |
| http://www.halopedia.org/Requisition_system | | http://www.halopedia.org/Requisition_system |
Line 46: |
Line 29: |
| ::::Not sure if that makes sense but throwing that out there.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 19:49, 18 September 2015 (EDT) | | ::::Not sure if that makes sense but throwing that out there.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 19:49, 18 September 2015 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| ==Text bug?==
| | ==Right now(before launch)== |
| Why is "certifications" lit up blue like it is a link?--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 19:23, 19 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :I'm not seeing it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 10:01, 20 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Right now (before launch)== | |
| Should we include the E3 cards that currently dont have an up to date place. Or leave them till a more accurate source comes along? - [[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 13:55, 20 September 2015 (GMT) | | Should we include the E3 cards that currently dont have an up to date place. Or leave them till a more accurate source comes along? - [[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 13:55, 20 September 2015 (GMT) |
| :I think we should put them in for now as placeholders, but maybe in the description put like "E3 build stats"--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 09:22, 20 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ==Rarity or Name==
| |
| I also think it might be smart to keep similar cards near eachother, such as the sniper rifles be next to eachother, but still could be rarity of them so uncommon is before legendary.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 09:23, 20 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :We can keep similar stuff like skins and so on in the said weapon/vehicle articles. I actually keep that updated quite well actually. So there really isnt any punishment to keep pages in Rarity order. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 14:33, 20 September 2015 (GMT)
| |
| ::I mean not like that broad but like keep similar weapon cards or vehicle cards near eachother might be good.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 09:51, 20 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| So for anyone outside reading this, this effects the
| |
| *Loadout Weapons(potentially)
| |
| *Weapon Skins
| |
| *Armor/Helmets
| |
| *And all the Single use warzone cards
| |
|
| |
| Well I vote Rarity mainly cause I feel its more organised that way(and that majority of the other way can be done on the main pages the weapons are on).
| |
| But if the majority think the other way that's fine.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 15:02, 20 September 2015 (GMT)
| |
| :Well armor and helmets wouldn't be affected, just vehicles, power weapons, loadout weapons, and weapon skins. Personally if I was browsing this I would be looking for a specific type of weapon and would look for that and all the variations would be near it, so you can easily find a card and it's variants without having to control-F. --[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 10:12, 20 September 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::Well Armor and Helmet skins. Their rarity's can be different. So they would be effected by this. :) And go ahead then. -[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 15:02, 20 September 2015 (GMT)
| |
|
| |
| ==A task for someone==
| |
| Add the following images to this.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 12:00, 25 March 2017 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| <gallery>
| |
| File:REQ Card - Ichor.png
| |
| File:REQ Card - DMR.png
| |
| File:REQ Loadout Weapon BR Long Barrel.png
| |
| File:REQ Loadout Weapon Longshot BR Kinetic.png
| |
| File:REQ Loadout Weapon Projection SMG Stabilating.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-KineticBolts.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-LongBarrel.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-LaserTargeter.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-Silencer.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-Stabilizer.png
| |
| File:H5G-ClassicBR-EnergyBayonet.png
| |
| File:H5G-Helmet-MarkVDelta.jpg
| |
| </gallery>
| |