Talk:Mount Erebus

Votes for Deletion

• Keep —This unsigned comment was made by 209.81.123.229 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
• Keep - Worth a mention. =D Cheers, RelentlessRecusant ^TALK • WORK • _SPEAK 21:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - as per above File:UoH.gif File:Lieutenant General insignia.pngThe Lieutenant General 21:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Well thats settled :)-User:SPARTAN-077
• over and out- April 8, 9:38, 2007

Well, it could use cleanup or it's a stub. --Blemo ^TALK • _{CONTRIBUTIONS} 05:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

A simple mention warrants an article? I think not. Ross Island article can simply have a wikipedia link to Mount Erebus. In fact, Im gonna do that right now.HAcame 20:43, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

It wasn't a simple mention. The Covenant were searching for artifacts at Mount Erebus, so it should stay--File:Colonel Grade One.png Col. Spartacus ^{Talk Page} _{Contributions} ^Contact 20:48, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

It's a simple mention not more than two sentences in the book. How is that even notable? Such information can be covered in the parent article, which is the Ross Island article. This is simply promoting redundancy. HAcame 20:52, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

Edit: I would appreciate it if you could stop from jumping the gun and hitting the revert button/undoing people's edit before people reach a consensus... you simply promoting an edit-war.. 9_9 HAcame 20:58, 30 March 2012 (EDT)