Talk:343 Guilty Spark

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

Era dispute

Should the post-war era be included in the era template? If the time after the events of the level The Covenant count as post-war, then I understand, but given the fact that the war between Humanity and the Covenant Separatists and Loyalists went on for over ten years after Truth's death, it shouldn't. --Turn out the Lights,

Monitor of Installation 04 and its replacement.

Are we sure about this, I mean we know that he was for the original installation but are we sure that he was for the replacement as well?--210.56.81.228 01:40, 28 July 2011 (EDT)


Halo Anniversary

Are we putting the people in Halo: Combat Evolved also in Halo: Anniversary? I don't know why, but that just seems kinda weird. Maybe that's just from 4 hours of sleep, idk. Vegerot (talk) 03:21, 28 July 2011 (EDT)!

Halo Anniversary is a port of the original game with a graphic enhancement (not a remake - remakes are re-made); I don't think it's necessary. Then again, we also have articles like Halo 2 Vista.-- Forerunner 05:54, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
I agree it's unnecessary to add Anniversary to appearances sections - basically, if it's in the original game, you know it's in Anniversary and the other way around. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 06:00, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
I know I'm just an annon but hear me out, I think Anniversary should be in the appearances section based on the new terminals. The teaser trailer showed several monitors which means that new characters are being introduced and their only appearance will be Anniversary for now. Maybe we should just add it for the new characters but it is something to consider--210.56.81.17 07:52, 28 July 2011 (EDT)