Talk:I love bees synopsis

Is this considered canon to Halo?

How do you think this should this be cleaned up? --Dragonclaws^(talk) 05:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Mucho shorten-o. WAY too long for a synopsis, IMO. BTW, Dragonclaws, you should get on the IRC whenever you're on--we've got a new link that works bettar sorta, and it's easier to work together to clean up an article when you're all chatting live. I'll work on shortening tomorrow, unless someone beats meh to it, 'cause I gotta go to bed... night! --NOTASTAFF GPT_(talk)^(eating) 05:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I left out a lot of stuff, though. This is the shortened version. Heh. I see your point, though. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 06:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

It should be broken up into sections to make things look a little more organized.--Darth Scott 04:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Dire Concequences...

Shouldn't there be something in the synopsis about Herzog's mysterious calls from the afterlife in chapters 9 and 10. He talks with Rani but she doesn't remember, or somebody faked the transmissions to Durga. Who's responsible?

Also, when Jersey shut off the artifact it sent another burst signal through slipspace and realspace. This may have led the Covenant to Earth. --Mayhemm 04:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

What the deal is with the Herzog fakes is that the Operator on ilovebees needed to communicate information about the artifact to Durga, so she created audio files that look like Durga's standard spying. It probably should be worked into the synopsis, yes. And I believe that the artifact was what drew the Covenant as far as ILB canon goes. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 09:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you're talking about the Operator that was corrupted by the Seeker virus to reveal the location of the artifact to the Covenant, right? Does that mean the whole Chawla Base mission was simply a plot to trick the group into triggering the artifact and alerting the Covenant?

And is the ILB canon not recognized as "official" on the issue of the Covenant attack for some reason? --Mayhemm 02:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)