Wait, "planet" of Groombridge-1830? It's a system. Does the bonus content specifically label it as a planet? --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 13:30, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad. Changed to system.
- // ŝтŕγκęŕ [ COM | LOG/M | LOG/S ] 15:45, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, actually, I checked again, and the book says "We are in orbit above Groombridge-1830", seeming to suggest that Groombridge-1830 is a planet.
- // ŝтŕγκęŕ [ COM | LOG/M | LOG/S ] 17:15, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, that's odd, since it's the name of a real-life star. It's probably a mistake on the author's part, but I still think it would be out of place to label it as a planet unless directly stated. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 17:20, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- There's sevral planets named after the stars they orbit. One that comes to mind is GJ 1214 B , shouldn't the planet just have a B beside its name. Whoever was saying that sentance probably dropped the "B" from the name to make it easier to say. Que Sera, Sera 18:02, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- True, but dropping the letter (or number, whatever) makes it sound nonsensical (or unprofessional, at the very least) since the star could have multiple planets orbiting it. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 18:06, August 22, 2010 (UTC)