Halopedia talk:Halopedian of the Month/07 2010

Add topic
Revision as of 01:33, December 13, 2008 by Halopediaman (talk | contribs) (→‎Votes)

According to the Self-Voting Amendment, users may no longer vote for themselves until someone votes for them first.

Template:Shortcut

Before You Vote

  • Only votes from users who have accounts on Halopedia and whose vote are cast while being logged in will count. The account must have been created at least one month before the vote and have at least 50 article edits.
  • For example, if one is voting for HOTM for the month of October then the user must have created their account in July or before July.
  • Votes will be counted for next month. Please vote on the section for next month, because only the votes in that section will be counted.
  • You can vote one time only. If you wish to change your vote, cross out (but do not remove) any previous votes you have made.
  • Please bold your nomination so it is easier to see.
  • In the event of a tie the results from the edit count page will be used as a tie breaker.
  • You must put your vote with your signature in the voting area. In the end votes with signatures are the only ones that will be counted.

January 2009

Nominees

Votes

  • Spirit-of-HALO As per nomination. SoH has been an exceptional user, helping the Admins with vandals and informing of abuse.-KAC-  06:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Spirit-of-HALO - Spirit-of-HALO is a good, major veteran user, he deserves this, for all the hard work he has done. Template:Nicmavr/sig
  • Spirit of Fire As a good friend of his, I've seen him work hard and enjoy every second of it, you dserve it! SubnovaComm71Intell LOL 01:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Spirit-of-HALO As per all of the people who nominated him above, for he really deserves it! User:Spirit of Fire/Sig 12:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Spirit of Fire - Although Spirit-of-HALO has been a veteran user and a great contributor, Spirit of Fire has been far more active and contributing this month, so I'll have to vote for him. JEA13 File:CHIEF.JPG My comms device 13:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Spirit of Fire - As per JEA13 and Sub-71... Spirit of Fire is a great friend, and has contributed lots to Halopedia!! Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 16:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Spirit-of-HALO - Both are great guys, but I think Spirit-of-HALO deserves it more. Now offense Spirit of Fire. D1134
  • Spirit-of-HALO - As per the people who mades good points. Halopediaman

Comments

I think this is a bit wrong. what if other nominees join? Black Katana   My TalkMy EditcountMy Work 20:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Fixed it. Black Katana   My TalkMy EditcountMy Work 20:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Unless it's just me, I see no nomination reason, so Subtank, "As per nomination" is confusing me. Tigerrrrr 21:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

... simple comment works best!KAC 16:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
...Simple comment confuses most! :| Tigerrrrr 19:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
...Simple Jamie complicates all! ChurchReborn 22:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
...Simple me is confuzzled O_o Tigerrrrr 22:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
...Good! ^__________^ ChurchReborn 22:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree on what HaloDude said, "per nomination last month or so" isn't going to work. Colonel§pïrït-Ωf-ḤÁʟo File:SoHOfficialSeal.gif Talk Contribs Edits Quotes Wiki page 21:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


I agree with HaloDude... and I really don't see any reason to actually vote for Spirit of HALO. Shouldn't there be a neutral section and an against section? And is there any reason for the nomination? And as per Black Katana, "what if other nominees join?" This seems unofficial and disorganized for such an important page.

With regards, Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 23:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Then people would just change their votes, and a neutral and against section could get a bit complicated and unnecessary...but that's just my opinion. BananaCat File:1213452567 Cat-facts.jpg Message MeEdits Stats 17:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
I just think it should be "If you don't like the nominee, nominate another one or don't vote" like it's pretty much been. I think that'd avoid any conflicts between people too like how the usergroup elections can be sometimes, like here, and other stuff too that I could probably find, but that's just me. ChurchReborn 18:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Did you even looked at the historypage Kougermasters? my edits there explains why I said that. Greetings Black Katana   My TalkMy EditcountMy Work
Yeah, I looked....about an hour after I typed the comment. Problem is I was to lazy to change or strikeout what I said! :D --Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 14:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Ofcourse, it's YOU! I Should have known.. :P Greetings Black Katana   My TalkMy EditcountMy Work
"Ofcourse, it's YOU!" ? What is that supposed to mean, hmm? You should have known... You should have known what!?! Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 03:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Ease a bit, will ya? I was just kidding. It means nothing alright? ;) Greetings Black Katana   My TalkMy EditcountMy Work

I sort of agree with ChurchReborn and BananaCat. But I'm not voting for anyone unless they deserve it, or they are best for the award. I'd say that person is Spirit of Fire, but until there are more nominees, I can't fairly say for sure. Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 18:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I voted for Spirit of Fire. Lieutenant Commander Kougermasters 16:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:HOTMArchive