Forum:Gallery Standardization

Forums: Index → Community Proposal → Gallery Standardization

To keep this short and to the point what is everyone's thoughts on making the galleries essentially match their list of appearances sections? Subtank told me a while back that the Anniversary images should go with their perspective game images. However this was before Halo 2 Anniversary came out, and the different engines between the campaign and multiplayer does affect the way weapons and vehicles look. Likewise I've looked through the Manual of Style and the help sections and couldn't find proper protocol for the galleries.

So my proposal: Have the images in the gallery go in real life-chronological order based on their perspective media's release date. This would move most of the images from CEA and 2A down further in various article galleries. Ultimately this doesn't really change much, but I just wanted it to be made the standard.Sith-venator Wavingstrider (Commlink) 13:48, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

Comments

I've been wanting a chronological order too, but I've just been assuming it. I actually would prefer the Gallery to go in order of chronological release date of the media, but with remakes placed right after the originals. It's graphically less smooth of a transition, but I think it's more logical. Of course, I think any functionally important images, such as comparisons and diagrams should go first in a gallery, then the chronological order takes place.--File:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gifEnder the XenocideFile:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gif 14:12, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

Well as it stands right now this is what galleries are.

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

This is what I'd like them to be.

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Sith-venator Wavingstrider (Commlink) 14:23, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
It would be nice to have a proper standard for this. I'm alright if we incorporate this into the Layout Guide/Manual of Style.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 14:19, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

Exactly. This way it matches up with the same style we have for the list of appearances.Sith-venator Wavingstrider (Commlink) 14:23, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

As I've just mentioned it, I would favour a real world chronological order (ie, from 2001 to 2015), according to release dates. I think it's really helpful to compare how an appearance has evolved through time. It's also more or less easier to find images from a particular game. I think the remakes should belong to 2011 and 2014. When I look for CEA or H2A images, it feels awkward that they're in the beginning rather near the end. In my head, CEA fits between Reach and Halo 4. Visually, it's more consistent. It's also 343-made. It would be really helpful if the evolution from old design/graphics to new design/graphics was respected. Imrane-117 (talk) 14:25, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

So we got 3 votes for yes and 1 vote for no.Sith-venator Wavingstrider (Commlink) 14:29, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

Either way, within each game the order should go "concept art" -> "renders/CGI traiers" -> "cinematics" -> "engine cinematics" -> "gameplay" -> "studies/diagrams" -> "promotional material" -> "miscellaneous"--File:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gifEnder the XenocideFile:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gif 14:43, 11 May 2015 (EDT)

I feel like it should go concept art>renders/cgi>promotional material (Such as stuff on the covers, as things like Scanned are there own thing and would go even before the concept art)>cutscenes and gameplay (Going on the order itself of the game's campaign. Things in multiplayer can be arranged however.)>diagrams.Sith-venator Wavingstrider (Commlink) 14:50, 11 May 2015 (EDT)