Talk:Covenant battleship

Votes for Merge

• Merge This is obviously a Covenant supercarrier as mentoned in Halo: First Strike which says there was a ship that had 5 bubies sectons, and larger then a carrier -- Fist of Rukt 01:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Definately not. it is pure hypothesis that the supercarrier had "5 bulb[ous] sections". Cheers, RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 02:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

• Yours is the pure hypothesis. Mine is based on fact! -- Fist of Rukt 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

• Actually, yours are both hypothesis, but RR's is a fanon name, while FistofRukt's is a fanon merge. I'll take a fanon name when a canon name isn't present over a fanon merge any day.--Rotaretilbo 05:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Against - As per myself.--Rot 22:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• AgainstAgreed with RR.Bllasae 17:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge or not...this is still Important....

A Battleship is NOT s Class of Cruiser.... a Battleship is it's own group with Classes of Battleships...The Ship Template needs to be changed. --Gzalzi 22:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

NOT a Supercarrier

I think that it is fairly obvious that this is not a Supercarrier. The battlesip is stated to be only around 2km long. That is a lot shorter than an assault carrier which is about 5km long and a Supercarrier is supposed to be BIGGER than that. Also carrier's don't tend to be that well armed relying mostly on their escorts and their fighter craft. L55 02:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)