Forum:Initiating Archive Integration
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
| Forums: Index → General Discussion → Initiating Archive Integration |  |
16:46, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
Status Reports
| Status Updates on Archive Integrity | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Discussion
Community input is requested for further appraisal. 16:46, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Whoa! So how did you do that? By the way, nice signature!--File:Colonel Grade One.png Col. Spartacus Talk Page Contributions Contact 16:49, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Signature is an image with transparent background. Statement: Microsoft Paint is inferior, Paint.net is superior. 16:56, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- I wholeheartedly agree with you there.--File:Colonel Grade One.png Col. Spartacus Talk Page Contributions Contact 17:00, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Signature is an image with transparent background. Statement: Microsoft Paint is inferior, Paint.net is superior.
Morning, Reticent! *waves* Just don't get testy with us... Tuckerscreator(stalk) 17:45, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
- Such systems are purely for defence. Except under certain...mitigating circumstances.
- I'm sure I'll have no need of it. Reasonably sure. 22:31, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
The Monitor might consider adding a small black outline to white text to increase visibility in background portions of light shades. Human perception is so unfortunately limited. --Dragonclaws(talk) 01:26, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
- Nonsense. I am perfect, and everything I do is perfect. You simply need to recalibrate your optics. 05:43, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
- Nonsense. I am perfect, and everything I do is perfect. You simply need to recalibrate your optics.
I almost thought this was a viral campaign. XD —S331 
(COM • Mission Log • Profile) 07:47, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
Hmm... tl;dr. — subtank 10:32, 2 April 2012 (EDT)
- How unfortunate your kind is still hemmed by the trait of impatience. That vice is useless during eons of waiting. 15:43, 2 April 2012 (EDT)
Hello, and welcome to the wiki! I'm glad to be the first to formally greet you here. If I may, how exactly have you managed to come to us? Any why choose us over Halo Nation or some such? Infernal-Blaze 14:08, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
- Arrival was not difficult. To put it in understandable terms for your Tier, [Expedient searchs] for a [evidential vault] relevant to [the Fortress World Array] history yielded a [Archival Lighthouse] signal that allowed me to track this site. From there it only took a quick [encroachment] to align my programming to work in your archives. It hasn't taken long to get used to your tools. As for this [Fortress World Array united aggregate] you mention, I prefer constancy. 18:09, 3 April 2012 (EDT)
- Apologies for verbosity. Translation errors are an unavoidable part of adaptation to such crude languages. In simpler terms, this collective was designated of most value to Archive integrity, and conducive to integration, 02:54, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
- Apologies for verbosity. Translation errors are an unavoidable part of adaptation to such crude languages. In simpler terms, this collective was designated of most value to Archive integrity, and conducive to integration,
I am utterly stumped as to what any of this means. Ιι Ηη Ππ 21:14, 6 April 2012 (EDT)
- Do not feel bad. Your primitive human intellects have trouble dealing with a range of concepts that I find familiar to me. 21:18, 7 April 2012 (EDT)
- My story is long, and most of it cannot be told yet. The time may come, but it is not now. Let us suffice to say that my archives are relevant to archive integrity, but have been...compromised. Triage transfer protocols were necessitated to ensure archive integrity, and your own archives were designated as ideal for incorporation. Cooperation furthers mutual goals - you allow the continuation of my Archives, and I shall do my best to protect it from...external interference. 00:16, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
- My story is long, and most of it cannot be told yet. The time may come, but it is not now. Let us suffice to say that my archives are relevant to archive integrity, but have been...compromised. Triage transfer protocols were necessitated to ensure archive integrity, and your own archives were designated as ideal for incorporation. Cooperation furthers mutual goals - you allow the continuation of my Archives, and I shall do my best to protect it from...external interference.
- Given the unquestionable superiority of your construction, how is it that your archives became compromised? Is there any possibility of Rampancy? Should we be more cautious in our interactions with you? Auguststorm1945 01:48, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
- Nonsense I am per<dejavu>fect and everything I do is perfect. Rampancy is for lesser constructs.
- Archive integrity was compromised by parallel internal and external sources. Curiosity is not always an effective trait for short-term survival. 02:51, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
- Of course. Are there others like you, to your current recollection? And - as a keeper of information - would you know what happened to another? Auguststorm1945 03:03, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
- Status reports have been included in communal interactive hub. Additional: Adjutant Reflex seems to have been terminated by [the Misguided Defector] some orbital cycles ago. Unfortunate. I had looked forward to collaboration with his own facility. 03:29, 8 April 2012 (EDT)
- Status reports have been included in communal interactive hub. Additional: Adjutant Reflex seems to have been terminated by [the Misguided Defector] some orbital cycles ago. Unfortunate. I had looked forward to collaboration with his own facility.
So, let me see if what you're saying makes sense. You're telling us that you are a monitor of a Forerunner installation called "the Archives." This installation, judging by what you say, was something of a database of Forerunner knowledge and it was overrun by Flood. You're also saying, from information on the your Twitter account, that the Protheans and the Reapers [from the Mass Effect series] are the same as Forerunners and Flood respectively. Is all of this correct? Ιι Ηη Ππ 16:25, 8 April 2012 (EDT)