Talk:Assault harness

Not Ranger

This article specifies that this is the ranger armor used in Zero-G. But if you look at the descriptions in the Appearance Options in Halo 3, it says it's a Pre-covenant assault armor being re-issued by the separatists, which was apparently banned for Elite use by the Prophets under some sort of treaty.

Merge

Same reason as Elite Combat Armor, good article but should be merged to better collate information. --Ajax 013 16:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Support

1. as per above --Ajax 013 16:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
2. i think so to--Thire 4477 17:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Neutral -

Against -

1. I think they should remain separate articles. The EVA and CQB have their own articles, why not this one? On the Mk.VI Armor page the armors are mentioned and there are links the the main articles, that would help with this one. -- Shadow-609X ^{File:Shadow Emote 4.png} 18:01 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Thats because the EVA and CQB have a fiction background these ones, for now, don't (of course i will Relent if Bungie does release info on it)though i would be much happyier if the author didn't just make these standalone pages and wove them into other existing pages. --Ajax 013 22:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

But Assault Armor is still strongly distinct from Combat Armor. It needs an article. It's canon, it's important. -The Dark Lord Azathoth 17:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

1. They are two different types of armor. Gatu 'Makoree File:Rotate2.gif Reconciliation Revanance 17:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
2. As others have said, it is a different armor type, the SPARTAN perms have their own pages, and it is important to the story. (`Taham) `Mikulekee 01:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
3. Whether or not they don't have a fiction background, they are two totally different variations of Elite armour. I'm not sure merging the articles is better for halopedia. After all, we can't lose information on this, only gain it, so any further information can be added to this page.

Undo

Undid changes made by 24.60.143.148. Disrespected formatting and we could have stronger evidence that points to the sentence the user wrote Felix-157 20:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)