21,894
edits
Talk:Egret Spaceliner: Difference between revisions
→Proposed Article Change: Unidentified civilian transport ship
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Possibly, but it's not proof until there's a mention or observation of space flight. To me it just looks like a vertical takeoff airplane. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:59, 24 November 2011 (EST) | Possibly, but it's not proof until there's a mention or observation of space flight. To me it just looks like a vertical takeoff airplane. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 14:59, 24 November 2011 (EST) | ||
:VTOL?? These ships clearly are not VTOL. I mean, if they did, they'd have some kind of downward-facing turbine, rotor blade, or something! Those engines are like the engines on a jet cargo/passenger liner, or a space shuttle of sorts. A jet liner needs a runway to take off; a space shuttle is a little bit different in that it must "blast off" into space, but aesthetically almost same configuration. Backwards thrust, not downwards. --[[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 15:05, 24 November 2011 (EST)Xamikaze330 | :VTOL?? These ships clearly are not VTOL. I mean, if they did, they'd have some kind of downward-facing turbine, rotor blade, or something! Those engines are like the engines on a jet cargo/passenger liner, or a space shuttle of sorts. A jet liner needs a runway to take off; a space shuttle is a little bit different in that it must "blast off" vertically into space, but aesthetically almost same configuration. Backwards thrust, not downwards. --[[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 15:05, 24 November 2011 (EST)Xamikaze330 | ||
==Buoyancy== | ==Buoyancy== | ||