Talk:Rumbledrug: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:40, September 25, 2011

Should this page be renamed to "Waverly-class augmentor"? Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 15:53, 23 September 2011 (EDT)

I don't think so. The Waverly-class augmentor was only a specific type of rumbledrug, not the only one. If we were to rename the page we would have to eliminate the part about Badia Campbell, which I believe is an interesting piece of information.--

Rusty - 112 16:40, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:53, September 23, 2011 (edit) Tuckerscreator (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "Should this page be renamed to "Waverly-class augmentor"? ~~~~")		Revision as of 15:40, September 25, 2011 (edit) (undo) Rusty-112 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should this page be renamed to "Waverly-class augmentor"? [[User:Tuckerscreator\|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator\|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 15:53, 23 September 2011 (EDT)		Should this page be renamed to "Waverly-class augmentor"? [[User:Tuckerscreator\|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator\|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 15:53, 23 September 2011 (EDT)

			:I don't think so. The Waverly-class augmentor was only a specific type of rumbledrug, not the only one. If we were to rename the page we would have to eliminate the part about Badia Campbell, which I believe is an interesting piece of information.--[[File:Emblem 1.jpg\|20px]][[User:Rusty-112\|<span style="background:blue;font-size:12pt;color:white;">''' Rusty '''</span>]][[UserWiki:Rusty-112\|<span style="background:blue;font-size:12pt;color:white;">'''- 112 '''</span>]] 16:40, 25 September 2011 (EDT)