User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello: Difference between revisions

User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello (edit)

995 bytes added , 13 years ago

m

31

edits

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 "[H]umans only win when outnumbered". The Covenant have a habit of using the overflow strategy akin to the Red Army. By your logic the UNSC only looses when fighting a handful of enemies.....strange.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 10:25, 13 August 2011 (EDT)
+LOL!!!! I meant humans only win when they outnumber the Elites (direct quote: "Just because your tactics are different from the UNSC's doesn't make them inferior - just look at all of those battles the UNSC lost. Hell, the Marines only won in battles where they outnumbered the Covenant")
+another direct quote you said in favour of Elite tactics "The Sangheili-led siege on Alpha Base in an example of Sangheili tactics - they tricked the Marines into believing that they were a Pelican making its way in, when in actuality they were an armed force sent in to kill John-117. Going around killing people in close-quarters combat doesn't mean that you aren't a strategist - Sangheili have such a big advantage in CQC that they simply don't need to be tactical in such engagements, though neither does this mean that they don't use strategic tactics" --[[User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello|ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello]] 10:30, 13 August 2011 (EDT) Not very consistent in your arguments are you.