Talk:UNSC tactical eyepiece: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:38, July 14, 2011

Notable enough? Wouldn't it be better to have this information in the UNSC Army/Marine BDU?- 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 10:44, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

I would consider it notable enough. As it's only seen on handful of Marines and Troopers, that would suggest that it's elusive to a degree. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 10:52, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

It is attached to the Marine/Trooper helmet. Perhaps it doesn't need it's own article. [[File:Commander insignia.svg|25px]]<small><span style="border: 1px purple; -moz-border-radius:10px">[[User:Phoenix Marathon|'''<span style="background-color:Grey; color:Black; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px"> &nb 10:54, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

It's an optional attachment, yes. If it is only worthy of a mention on the helmet page, I would suggest we also merge the article with the one on the Halo 3-era "tactical goggles".-- Forerunner 11:08, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

isn't this a little small to display a motion sensor

Revision as of 10:08, October 29, 2010 (edit) Forerunner (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:38, July 14, 2011 (edit) (undo) Butthead4 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:It's an optional attachment, yes. If it is only worthy of a mention on the helmet page, I would suggest we also merge the article with the one on the Halo 3-era "tactical goggles".-- [[User talk:Forerunner\|Forerunner]] 11:08, 29 October 2010 (EDT)		:It's an optional attachment, yes. If it is only worthy of a mention on the helmet page, I would suggest we also merge the article with the one on the Halo 3-era "tactical goggles".-- [[User talk:Forerunner\|Forerunner]] 11:08, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
			isn't this a little small to display a motion sensor