Talk:Glassing: Difference between revisions

Talk:Glassing (edit)

Revision as of 21:30, January 7, 2011

188 bytes added , 14 years ago

→‎Best Ambigious

Steahl Senka

35

edits

Revision as of 20:18, January 7, 2011 (edit) Tuckerscreator (talk \| contribs) (Huge post, I'm afraid. Sorry.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:30, January 7, 2011 (edit) (undo) Steahl Senka (talk \| contribs) (→‎Best Ambigious) Newer edit →
Line 485:		Line 485:

	I would suggest that we edit the article to add a new section called “Feasibility” or “Authenticity” where we place all the relavaen t information on this issue, because I don’t think this is something that can be so easily solved. While the information takes the tone of retcon, other information from that same retcon supports the previous information, and I think that it’s best we rewrite the page to reflect that. [[User:Tuckerscreator\|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator\|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 19:18, 7 January 2011 (EST)		I would suggest that we edit the article to add a new section called “Feasibility” or “Authenticity” where we place all the relavaen t information on this issue, because I don’t think this is something that can be so easily solved. While the information takes the tone of retcon, other information from that same retcon supports the previous information, and I think that it’s best we rewrite the page to reflect that. [[User:Tuckerscreator\|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator\|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 19:18, 7 January 2011 (EST)

			I agree on the fact that its impossible. However I disagree with the simple reason that... what bungie said is cannon. [[User talk:Steahl Senka\|Steahl Senka]] 20:30, 7 January 2011 (EST)