2,500
edits
The Assembly: Difference between revisions
m
→Human-Covenant War
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
After the contact with the Covenant in [[2525]], the Assembly held a tribunal for one of its members who had apparently tried to contact the Covenant, making it indirectly responsible for the [[Human-Covenant War]]. In the same year, they discussed the [[Spartan-II Program]] and how it managed to reach operational capacity a year before the [[Insurrection]] expanded beyond control. | After the contact with the Covenant in [[2525]], the Assembly held a tribunal for one of its members who had apparently tried to contact the Covenant, making it indirectly responsible for the [[Human-Covenant War]]. In the same year, they discussed the [[Spartan-II Program]] and how it managed to reach operational capacity a year before the [[Insurrection]] expanded beyond control. | ||
After the Covenant assault of the colony of [[Biko]] in [[2526]], the Assembly analyzed the Covenant's [[glassing]] capabilities. While they concluded that they were not able to "glass" an entire planet, they decided to coin the term "glassing" to make the Covenant threat seem more severe. They also decided on the redistribution of human forces, namely the Spartan-IIs and ODSTs. Later, they discussed the possibility of a Covenant counterpart to the Assembly, and the possibility of contacting it and turning it on their side. | After the Covenant assault of the colony of [[Biko]] in [[2526]], the Assembly analyzed the Covenant's [[glassing]] capabilities. While they concluded that they were not able to "glass" an entire planet, they decided to coin the term "glassing" to make the Covenant threat seem more severe. They also decided on the redistribution of human forces, namely the Spartan-IIs and ODSTs. Later, they discussed the possibility of a [[High Council|Covenant counterpart]] to the Assembly, and the possibility of contacting it and turning it on their side. | ||
In [[2528]], the Minority made a decision to sacrifice remote, low-population colonies in order to determine the Covenant's pattern of operation and design effective countermeasures. In 2530, the Assembly discussed the losses so far the possibility of re-[[terraforming]] glassed worlds. To prevent human extinction, they also decided that they must be more open with their actions. | In [[2528]], the Minority made a decision to sacrifice remote, low-population colonies in order to determine the Covenant's pattern of operation and design effective countermeasures. In 2530, the Assembly discussed the losses so far the possibility of re-[[terraforming]] glassed worlds. To prevent human extinction, they also decided that they must be more open with their actions. | ||