Talk:Battle of Installation 00: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Forerunner (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
If one needs more evidence: in the initial stages of the Battle of the Ark, six pelicans were launched towards the Ark's surface, however, only three were dropped from the Dawn's cargo bay. This would seem to at least imply a second frigate's presence. [[User talk:D3in0nychu5|D3in0nychu5]] 23:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC) | If one needs more evidence: in the initial stages of the Battle of the Ark, six pelicans were launched towards the Ark's surface, however, only three were dropped from the Dawn's cargo bay. This would seem to at least imply a second frigate's presence. [[User talk:D3in0nychu5|D3in0nychu5]] 23:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I guess someone keeps removing it. It sand trap set on 00?-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 00:19, August 29, 2010 (UTC) | :I guess someone keeps removing it. It sand trap set on 00?-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 00:19, August 29, 2010 (UTC | ||
==infobox== | |||
the battle infobox is misleading. the separatists and forerunners are not part of the unsc. it appears to be an issue with the template itself {{User:Asdf1239/sig}} 02:04, 2 December 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:04, December 2, 2010
Why does it say second Battle of Installation 00 now?I don't recall there EVER being another one.Sith Venator 02:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The one with Mendicant Bias? --Dragonclaws(talk) 03:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Maybe,but even so they were 2 different wars thus still wouldn't be a second just a Battle of Instalation 00(Forerunner-Flood War) and Battle of Instalation 00(Human-Covenant War).Sith Venator 23:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
New Main Image
This page is mighty impressive yes. But the main image in my opinion ought to be changed. I don't think three ODSTs running in a line showcases this battle appropriately. I don't know what to put in place but I suggest the space battle image, or possibly an image from the ground battle involving large UNSC forces etc. Wr1ghty 10:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Timeline of Battle
Why does it say the battle takes months? It seems like it just take hours (timeline wise)? There doesn't seem to indicate any sleeping time and waiting time and why would it take months to activate the rings if you're already at The Ark?--99.237.222.73 23:08, October 13, 2009 (UTC)
Aegis Fate
Why isn't the Aegis Fate included here? Bungie claims that their multiplayer maps are all more or less canonical, so the map Sandtrap should be enough to warrant its inclusion here. If one needs more evidence: in the initial stages of the Battle of the Ark, six pelicans were launched towards the Ark's surface, however, only three were dropped from the Dawn's cargo bay. This would seem to at least imply a second frigate's presence. D3in0nychu5 23:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
infobox
the battle infobox is misleading. the separatists and forerunners are not part of the unsc. it appears to be an issue with the template itself User:Asdf1239/sig 02:04, 2 December 2010 (EST)