Talk:Assault harness: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:21, September 11, 2007

Merge

Same reason as Elite Combat Armor, good article but should be merged to better collate information. --Ajax 013 16:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Support

as per above --Ajax 013 16:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral -

Against -

I think they should remain separate articles. The EVA and CQB have their own articles, why not this one? On the Mk.VI Armor page the armors are mentioned and there are links the the main articles, that would help with this one. -- Shadow-609X ^{File:Shadow Emote 4.png 18:01 8 August 2007 (UTC)}

Thats because the EVA and CQB have a fiction background these ones, for now, don't (of course i will Relent if Bungie does release info on it)though i would be much happyier if the author didn't just make these standalone pages and wove them into other existing pages. --Ajax 013 22:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

But Assault Armor is still strongly distinct from Combat Armor. It needs an article. It's canon, it's important. -The Dark Lord Azathoth 17:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

2. i agree, it should be a seperate article. --67.9.80.176

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :Thats because the EVA and CQB have a fiction background these ones, for now, don't (of course i will Relent if Bungie does release info on it)though i would be much happyier if the author didn't just make these standalone pages and wove them into other existing pages. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 22:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 ::But Assault Armor is still strongly distinct from Combat Armor. It needs an article. It's canon, it's important. -[[User:Azathoth|The Dark Lord Azathoth]] 17:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
+. i agree, it should be a seperate article. --[[User:67.9.80.176|67.9.80.176]]