3,732
edits
Talk:United Nations Space Command: Difference between revisions
m
→The UNSC is primitive
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 383: | Line 383: | ||
well good point I guess... | well good point I guess... | ||
but even if they can't make a new weapon system the old one should still be somewhat good. | but even if they can't make a new weapon system the old one should still be somewhat good. | ||
Liek the scorpion tank is totally horrible even an | Liek the scorpion tank is totally horrible even an insurrectionist with a RPG can take it down. | ||
Even going down to lowest tech, wouldn't scorpions | Even going down to lowest tech, wouldn't scorpions have railgun turrets or gauss like the mammoths and predator tanks in CnC 3. I dont know but it seems the UNSC has almost not changed much in gun technology. You would think before the war, which was a still goof couple centuries to research, they could of come up wiht a better weapon. | ||
RAWR THE COOKIE MONSTA! 08:16, December 24, 2009 (UTC) | RAWR THE COOKIE MONSTA! 08:16, December 24, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Complacency, perhaps? Generally, when something works for one conflict, we tend to keep it around until we're hit with something superior and then, it hits us: "oh, crap, we better upgrade or they're going to kill us all" (this tends to apply to tactics as well). Before the Human-Covenant war, all they were fighting were other people, and lead and nukes work just fine against another human. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:#770000; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:#770000; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 08:53, December 24, 2009 (UTC) | |||