Talk:Fall of Reach: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:12, April 14, 2007

Good work on the picture i didnt think of that --Climax Viod 20:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Very professional. -- Spartan 1138 15:45, 16 October 2006)

How did they lose.

how did they lose like there were 13 sparterns there including john (the master chief)

Modifying the timetable

I'm going to modify the time table in... let's give one week for objections. Modifications are as follows:

Battle End: August 30, 2552? to September 23, 2552 (Military Calendar)
Seeing as the bettle for Reach technically ended when all resistance was eliminated or neutralized, John-117 and everyone with him left Reach at this time as the last known survivors.
Halo: First Strike Page 200 header.

Outcome: Ended with Covenant victory; Reach was glassed to "Reach was Partially Glassed"
Seeing as only the poles were glassed, this seems appropriate.

Supreme Commander of the Fleet of Particular Justice to The Arbiter -- Supreme Commander of the Fleet of Particular Justice
It seems appropriate.

68.35.73.108 07:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC) VikedaL

Bracktanus

bracktanus isn't in the battle of reach he is only mentioned by two grunts that are actually in the battle so i'm taking him out. - SPARTAN-410

Pillar of Autumn as a loss?

Should the PoA be counted a loss for the UNSC since it escaped and was destroyed later?

losses

Perhaps it had 302 covenant ships destroyed but 12 millions of dead I dont think, we need infos. Chief frank 001 23:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 Should the PoA be counted a loss for the UNSC since it escaped and was destroyed later?
 ==losses==
-Perhapes it had 302 covenant ships destroyed but 12 millions of dead I dont think, we need infos.
+Perhaps it had 302 covenant ships destroyed but 12 millions of dead I dont think, we need infos.
 [[User:Chief frank 001|Chief frank 001]] 23:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)