Template talk:Deleted Material

About removing deleted canon material

I'm not going to edit the template just yet, but I personally disagree with removing deleted material that has since been canonized. While the material in question may have been canonized in a novel or other media, it doesn't change the fact that the material never made it into the final version of a game. For that reason, it still falls under deleted content, it has just since been canonized in later media.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 13:18, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

I concur with the above. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 14:06, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

That makes a lot of sense. I'd be okay with that.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 17:47, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

Deleted Material implies that it has never made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it was deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat of Morheka} 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

Game by game instead of what type of content

Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-CIA391 (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT)

I agree. If necessary, we could even implemented nested navboxes like what is used for the campaign/ multiplayer menus.