Template talk:Deleted Material: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Deleted Material implies that it has ''never'' made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it ''was'' deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT) | :Deleted Material implies that it has ''never'' made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it ''was'' deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT) | ||
==Game by game instead of what type of content== | |||
Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:07, August 28, 2018
About removing deleted canon material
I'm not going to edit the template just yet, but I personally disagree with removing deleted material that has since been canonized. While the material in question may have been canonized in a novel or other media, it doesn't change the fact that the material never made it into the final version of a game. For that reason, it still falls under deleted content, it has just since been canonized in later media.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 13:18, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- I concur with the above. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 14:06, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- Agreed. Though instead of just using the deleted content category, maybe we could have a category for material that once was deleted but canonized in later media. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 15:29, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- Deleted Material implies that it has never made it into a canon product. I would rather keep them off the template, for clarity's sake, but include a small paragraph explaining that it was deleted material but was reintroduced later. And, as NightHammer suggested, a new category for (I guess) recanonised material might be appropriate. -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 20:11, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
Game by game instead of what type of content
Wouldnt it be easier to understand if it was organised game by game instead of the current format?-CIA391 (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2018 (EDT)