Talk:Siege of Paris IV: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
NightHammer (talk | contribs) (→Year) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Year== | ==Year== | ||
Does anyone know where the idea that the siege took place in 2549 came from? I've just checked ''First Strike'' and the ''HGN'' and turned up nothing. Given that [http://www.halopedia.org/index.php?title=Siege_of_Paris_IV&diff=1201604&oldid=1201528 a fair amount of the article] (specifically the involvement of Marines other than Johnson, Johnson defending the main evacuation site, and the Covenant winning) had no provenance in official sources, it's entirely possible that the year of the siege is simply fanon that's been allowed to remain since 2006. --[[User:Braidenvl|<span style="color:gray">'''''Our answer is at hand.'''''</span>]] [[File:Gravemind.svg|14px]] ([[User talk:Braidenvl|<span style="color:gray">Talk to me.</span>]]) 13:08, 4 February 2017 (EST) | Does anyone know where the idea that the siege took place in 2549 came from? I've just checked ''First Strike'' and the ''HGN'' and turned up nothing. Given that [http://www.halopedia.org/index.php?title=Siege_of_Paris_IV&diff=1201604&oldid=1201528 a fair amount of the article] (specifically the involvement of Marines other than Johnson, Johnson defending the main evacuation site, and the Covenant winning) had no provenance in official sources, it's entirely possible that the year of the siege is simply fanon that's been allowed to remain since 2006. --[[User:Braidenvl|<span style="color:gray">'''''Our answer is at hand.'''''</span>]] [[File:Gravemind.svg|14px]] ([[User talk:Braidenvl|<span style="color:gray">Talk to me.</span>]]) 13:08, 4 February 2017 (EST) | ||
:The ''Encyclopedia'' states the siege took place in 2549. It's likely the ''Encyclopedia'' took it from here, but it's still canon at least. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 18:54, 4 February 2017 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, February 4, 2017
Expand
Expand please.
- As nothing more has been mentioned about the conflict it can not possibly be expanded until there is more information. -ED 20:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Where Do You Get These Numbers
I donot remember the casulties being talked about yet here you have them. What is going on? —This unsigned comment was made by Jin Won (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
- Probably made up, or a fanfic someone confused with Bungie canon. --68.44.13.236 23:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Outdated facts
Can someone fix this (specifically the edit about Boren's Syndrome)? Or at least unlock the article, or explain why the Halo Graphic Novel is fanon? --68.44.13.236 23:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Those facts were never stated in the HGN and it is not directly implied that Paris IV itself is the cover up. —This unsigned comment was made by Ajax 013 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
Year
Does anyone know where the idea that the siege took place in 2549 came from? I've just checked First Strike and the HGN and turned up nothing. Given that a fair amount of the article (specifically the involvement of Marines other than Johnson, Johnson defending the main evacuation site, and the Covenant winning) had no provenance in official sources, it's entirely possible that the year of the siege is simply fanon that's been allowed to remain since 2006. --Our answer is at hand. 
(Talk to me.) 13:08, 4 February 2017 (EST)
- The Encyclopedia states the siege took place in 2549. It's likely the Encyclopedia took it from here, but it's still canon at least. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 18:54, 4 February 2017 (EST)