Forum:An important question about consistency formatting: Difference between revisions

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents
UNSC	United Nations Space Command

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents
Covenant ; Flood	United Nations Space Command ; Swords of Sanghelios

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents
Covenant; Flood;	United Nations Space Command; Swords of Sanghelios;

Revision as of 07:46, August 26, 2016

Forums: Index → Community Proposal → An important question about consistency formatting

I see a lot of inconsistent formatting on the wiki. I'm curious as to wich format we are sticking too with these two questions.

1. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we use point form for each faction? or should we not use point form. See the first two examples on the right.

2. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we show the short form of a faction, or the full name. I see UNSC being used sometimes, and United Nations Space Command being used in other times. Which one should we use? See the third example.

Whichever one we use, I'll be happy to take the time to go though each article and keep the format consistent. Which formats are we choosing?

I personally prefer the first format. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 08:45, 26 August 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:04, August 26, 2016 (view source) Covenant PhD (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:46, August 26, 2016 (view source) NightHammer (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 86:		Line 86:

	::::		::::

			:I personally prefer the first format. --[[User:NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 08:45, 26 August 2016 (EDT)