Talk:Planetary warfare

Torn on whether to use this, this or this image as the article lead. -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat of Morheka} 05:29, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

If only this wasn't concept art. Anyway, I would choose the third image. It isn't incredibly ideal, but it does encapsulate planetary warfare very well. It even has the Flood there. -- Topal the Pilot (Talk|Contribs) 20:49, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

Just FYI, only you (and maybe Bureaucrats?) can edit the page since it's your user page. Maybe move it to Halopedia's Sandbox? --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 10:16, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Personally I like Topal's picture a lot. Otherwise I'll go with Morhek's third. Imrane-117 (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Agreed. --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:38, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Note for future reference: UNSC Army employs combat divers. --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:20, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat of Morheka} 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

Looks good. I do agree that types of warfare may be useful, though. --NightHammer^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:49, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

Move to Namespace?

Besides the referencing, I'm liking how this turned out. My life is filled with caring for a toddler niece and helping her parents move right now, so I could use some help with the referencing. Would people recommend shifting the article before or after we finish that? -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat of Morheka} 20:00, 16 April 2016 (EDT)