Talk:Planetary warfare: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:49, April 10, 2016

Torn on whether to use this, this or this image as the article lead. -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat} ^{of Morheka} 05:29, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

If only this wasn't concept art. Anyway, I would choose the third image. It isn't incredibly ideal, but it does encapsulate planetary warfare very well. It even has the Flood there. -- Topal the Pilot

(Talk|Contribs) 20:49, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

Just FYI, only you (and maybe Bureaucrats?) can edit the page since it's your user page. Maybe move it to Halopedia's Sandbox? --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 10:16, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Personally I like Topal's picture a lot. Otherwise I'll go with Morhek's third. Imrane-117 (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Agreed. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 11:38, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

Note for future reference: UNSC Army employs combat divers. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 12:20, 7 April 2016 (EDT)

So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- Qura 'Morhek ^{The Autocrat} ^{of Morheka} 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

Looks good. I do agree that types of warfare may be useful, though. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 23:49, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:33, April 10, 2016 (edit) Morhek (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:49, April 10, 2016 (edit) (undo) NightHammer (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- [[User:Morhek\|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306\|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306\|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT)		So besides referencing and the gallery, how do we think this looks? Should we have sections on, say, conventional war, assymmetrical warfare, etc, or is that outside the purview of the article's scope? -- [[User:Morhek\|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306\|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306\|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 23:33, 10 April 2016 (EDT)

			:Looks good. I do agree that types of warfare may be useful, though. --[[User:NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer\|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 23:49, 10 April 2016 (EDT)