Talk:Halo: The Essential Visual Guide: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
NightHammer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/88.120.49.44|88.120.49.44]] 07:51, 2 February 2016 (EST). | [[Special:Contributions/88.120.49.44|88.120.49.44]] 07:51, 2 February 2016 (EST). | ||
:It was discovered internally, but at too late a stage to make the edit. Is your copy newer than July, 2011? If so, you may have a corrected copy. The errors listed would only apply to the first edition or so I imagine. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 12:00, 2 February 2016 (EST) | :It was discovered internally, but at too late a stage to make the edit. Is your copy newer than July, 2011? If so, you may have a corrected copy. The errors listed would only apply to the first edition or so I imagine. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 12:00, 2 February 2016 (EST) | ||
::My edition is dated 05/2011. [[Special:Contributions/88.120.49.44|88.120.49.44]] 14:19, 2 February 2016 (EST). |
Revision as of 14:19, February 2, 2016
New edition coming out, or is this already done?
I was just wondering, does it still need the New Content template? It seems to me all the content that ever came out is already here, unless they plan to release a revised version, which, granted, would be great, plus the addition of maybe a few new entries on some questionable items and the like, which I have yet to hear anything about, or if not, then why is the New Content template still here? Is there something else we should know about? --Xamikaze330 13:13, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330
- Yeah, there's no reason to have that tag anymore.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs
- Thank you. --Xamikaze330 16:25, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330
Errors
- On page 16, it is erroneously stated that the MA5C assault rifle does not appear in Halo 3: ODST. -> Halo 3: ODST is noted in the statistics box.
- On page 160, the Rookie should be listed with "UNSC Marine Corps" instead of "UNSC Navy", similar to his squadmates' entries. -> I don't see any mention of the UNSC Navy on his page. He is clearly listed as UNSC Marine Corps.
88.120.49.44 07:51, 2 February 2016 (EST).
- It was discovered internally, but at too late a stage to make the edit. Is your copy newer than July, 2011? If so, you may have a corrected copy. The errors listed would only apply to the first edition or so I imagine. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2016 (EST)
- My edition is dated 05/2011. 88.120.49.44 14:19, 2 February 2016 (EST).