Talk:House of 'Sraom: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:We only know that he was a banshee pilot, unless there is a disambiguous page for Banshee's then it should not be linked to avoid speculation, the Banshee in this article is referring to the Banshee he uses in-canon (not warzone) and we do not know what he uses. [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. <small>([[User talk:AlertFiend|Converse]]) </small> 18:05, 25 January 2016 (EST) | :We only know that he was a banshee pilot, unless there is a disambiguous page for Banshee's then it should not be linked to avoid speculation, the Banshee in this article is referring to the Banshee he uses in-canon (not warzone) and we do not know what he uses. [[User:Alertfiend|Alertfiend]] - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. <small>([[User talk:AlertFiend|Converse]]) </small> 18:05, 25 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::Warzone is not listed as non-canon, but certain parts of it may | ::Warzone is not listed as non-canon, but certain parts of it may be canon. It would make sense to simply say Banshee, with a redirect to T-54. This is not speculation, as it leaves it ambiguous in the article, but also redirects to the Banshee that he is known to fly in gameplay (its not confirmed as non-canon, so we could leave it ambiguous and still show what the gameplay demonstrates). If 343 confirms it as non-canon we could change it at a later date.[[User:Garuda 01|Garuda 01]] ([[User talk:Garuda 01|talk]]) 21:09, 25 January 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:10, January 25, 2016
House of 'Sraom Banshee
I recently edited this page, which erroneously states that 'Sraom flies a T-26 Banshee, to the T-54 (with the text stating banshee to keep it ambiguous. It should be reverted back to T-54 for two reasons:
A)In the Canon Fodder it is not stated which banshee variant he flies (it could be the T-27 for all we know!) B)In warzone he flies a T-54, which is also stated on his page. While we doesn't know the type, it would make sense to say Banshee, and redirect to the one that we see him fly in the simulation. 24.192.250.124 13:29, 24 January 2016 (EST)
- Agreed. The T-26 Banshee was not mentioned explicitly, so by default we should just say "Banshee" and redirect it to the only Banshee we know he has used, even if the canonicity of Warzone bosses isn't quite perfect. And the "T-54" Hesduros Banshee probably existed before '54 anyway. Imrane-117 (talk) 13:49, 24 January 2016 (EST)
Why does it say I reverted Imranes edit? I just pressed edit. Alertfiend - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. (Converse) 21:54, 24 January 2016 (EST)
- Ok, why should this not redirect to the Type-54 Banshee? It seems like a good idea based on the information we have. Garuda 01 (talk) 11:58, 25 January 2016 (EST)
- We only know that he was a banshee pilot, unless there is a disambiguous page for Banshee's then it should not be linked to avoid speculation, the Banshee in this article is referring to the Banshee he uses in-canon (not warzone) and we do not know what he uses. Alertfiend - Warning, my comments may appear passive aggressive. (Converse) 18:05, 25 January 2016 (EST)
- Warzone is not listed as non-canon, but certain parts of it may be canon. It would make sense to simply say Banshee, with a redirect to T-54. This is not speculation, as it leaves it ambiguous in the article, but also redirects to the Banshee that he is known to fly in gameplay (its not confirmed as non-canon, so we could leave it ambiguous and still show what the gameplay demonstrates). If 343 confirms it as non-canon we could change it at a later date.Garuda 01 (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2016 (EST)