Talk:Genesis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:39, November 4, 2015

Artificial

I might have missed/forgotten a line, but do we know if Genesis is entirely artificial? Could just be heavily terraformed with Forerunner structures across its surface. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 16:00, 4 November 2015 (EST)

I thought it was mentioned somewhere to be artificially constructed by the Builders. Perhaps it may have come from the Mission Intel? There are a few audio logs with an unnamed Builder talking.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 16:19, 4 November 2015 (EST)

It was Linda "There's a formalness and precision to it all. It seems...artificial, but still organic" Lyk2 (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2015 (EST)

I figured Linda was talking about the environment (the coral-like plants) rather than the world itself. --NightHammer^(talk)^(contribs) 16:39, 4 November 2015 (EST)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :I thought it was mentioned somewhere to be artificially constructed by the Builders. Perhaps it may have come from the Mission Intel? There are a few audio logs with an unnamed Builder talking.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 16:19, 4 November 2015 (EST)
 :: It was Linda "There's a formalness and precision to it all. It seems...artificial, but still organic" [[User:Lyk2|Lyk2]] ([[User talk:Lyk2|talk]]) 16:32, 4 November 2015 (EST)
+:::I figured Linda was talking about the environment (the coral-like plants) rather than the world itself. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 16:39, 4 November 2015 (EST)