Forum:Gifs in Articles: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:09, December 17, 2012

Forums: Index → General Discussion → Gifs in Articles

Tucker's Creator here. So I've found myself visiting Tumblr more often than I think I should, and I find that many of the Halo fans there post up some pretty excellent Halo .gifs. Gifs of the cutscenes, of the gameplay, of important moments, etc. I noticed so far that we keep gifs relegated to solely the gallery sections of articles, and never in-universe parts. And the Image Policy has nothing to say on them.

I think that gifs could be useful in detailing some parts of the articles, especially level and trailer transcripts, since they often have to describe pictures with a thousand words. For some parts, like the Didact's awakening in the level Forerunner, gifs could be useful in illustrating. On the other hand, on biographies and other descriptions there may be the opinion that they'll look unprofessional there, which I find myself leaning towards. Either way, there are positives and negatives.

So what do you guys say? Yay gifs, or nay gifs? Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 03:12, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Comment, you miscreants!

Yay. I don't see any problem with putting gifs in articles.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 11:17, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Absolutely! As long as the gifs are relatively small (for those with lesser connections) and can still display a scene with good quality (both definition and editing), I see no problem with this. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

You would want gifs, Grizzlei-of-the-crazy-Tumblr. Thanks! If you see any, be sure to upload them too. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 20:29, 17 November 2012 (EST)

Gifs should be used in articles, when available. I have already used a couple of them and don't see why we shouldn't use them. Take the assassination article, for example. Gifs work great on it. --Shadow Dancer ^|contribs| 12:40, 19 November 2012 (EST)

File:ImsPxkEKgG6Iv.gif

My excuse to post this. ~~I regret nothing~~. On one hand Gifs depicting certain events should be long, around 30 seconds or so, if we do implement them. On the other, it could be an eye-sore when one is reading an article. In my opinion however, it just seems a bit to unprofessional. But hey, whatever the community wants. -Killjax (talk | contribs)

Mind you, a 30-second long gif with even the poorest, yet visibility appealing quality would be a very large file. Grizzlei ♥ ツ

O definitely. Gifs are cool. I, of course, have no idea where to find any (yes i know he mentioned a place) This is craZboy557, signing off. 20:32, 20 November 2012 (EST)

I'd just put them for brief snippets, to go along with a transcript. Having a long clip would just interrupt the flow of the article. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 21:09, 20 November 2012 (EST)

Having seen them in action in Epilogue, I have to say that gifs look incredibly distracting in the article body. Not just that, but for me their excessive use gives off an unprofessional impression - this is an encyclopedia, not someone's Tumblr feed. I have no problem with using gifs with discretion (as I interpreted the original proposal), mostly for things that are best demonstrated by animations (e.g. the Forerunner weapons' assembly animations or the like), but having a gif of every shot out there that might as well be portrayed by a static image (like the Chief walking in slow motion) comes across as gimmicky and quite frankly, completely unnecessary. It doesn't help if the gifs are of a quality that would get them deleted if they were normal static images. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 09:56, 17 December 2012 (EST)

I thought they demonstrated some aspects like the last shot very well. But others did look kinda messy. The main problem is that most of them were used in photosets, so they're very small and short. Now, I expect that will improve as I contact people with ability to make longer ones, but there's gonna be a bit of trial and error. It's not worth throwing out yet, but review will be needed for the first ones.

As for the gif quality, some of them are small by necessity. I recall larger ones take longer to load and stop moving if they're made to look too small on the page. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 11:09, 17 December 2012 (EST)

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ::Having seen them in action in [[Epilogue (Halo 4 level)|Epilogue]], I have to say that gifs look incredibly distracting in the article body. Not just that, but for me their excessive use gives off an unprofessional impression - this is an encyclopedia, not someone's Tumblr feed. I have no problem with using gifs with discretion (as I interpreted the original proposal), mostly for things that are best demonstrated by animations (e.g. the Forerunner weapons' assembly animations or the like), but having a gif of every shot out there that might as well be portrayed by a static image (like the Chief walking in slow motion) comes across as gimmicky and quite frankly, completely unnecessary. It doesn't help if the gifs are of a quality that would get them deleted if they were normal static images. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 09:56, 17 December 2012 (EST)
+I thought they demonstrated some aspects like the last shot very well. But others did look kinda messy. The main problem is that most of them were used in photosets, so they're very small and short. Now, I expect that will improve as I contact people with ability to make longer ones, but there's gonna be a bit of trial and error. It's not worth throwing out yet, but review will be needed for the first ones.
+As for the gif quality, some of them are small by necessity. I recall larger ones take longer to load and stop moving if they're made to look too small on the page. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 11:09, 17 December 2012 (EST)