Talk:Halo Array: Difference between revisions

Line 392:

I think using a talk page discussion as a citation could set a bad precedent for future scenarios, and we should still push for a quote from 343i. ToaFreak, may I ask if you still plan on mentioning your discussion with Jeremy briefly in a future video? That would make for a better source than a talk page. Thanks![[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 22:20, 18 September 2017 (EDT)

:We've cited talk pages in the past in regards to [[User:ScaleMaster117|Stephen Loftus']] statements, but it's generally not the ideal solution. IMO, 343i are the ones setting a bad precedent here, limiting this clearly important canonical information to an exclusive event rather than include it in a Canon Fodder article or something like ''Warfleet''. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 11:00, 19 September 2017 (EDT)

::May I suggest a {{plain|[http://bfy.tw/E0qa nuclear option]}}: to consider ToaFreak's statement as hearsay unless shown to the contrary. It is unlike Stephen Loftus' situation cited above and resolves all issues. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 12:38, 19 September 2017 (EDT)

@@ Line 392: / Line 392: @@
 I think using a talk page discussion as a citation could set a bad precedent for future scenarios, and we should still push for a quote from 343i. ToaFreak, may I ask if you still plan on mentioning your discussion with Jeremy briefly in a future video? That would make for a better source than a talk page. Thanks![[User:Editorguy|Editorguy]] ([[User talk:Editorguy|talk]]) 22:20, 18 September 2017 (EDT)
 :We've cited talk pages in the past in regards to [[User:ScaleMaster117|Stephen Loftus']] statements, but it's generally not the ideal solution. IMO, 343i are the ones setting a bad precedent here, limiting this clearly important canonical information to an exclusive event rather than include it in a Canon Fodder article or something like ''Warfleet''. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 11:00, 19 September 2017 (EDT)
+::May I suggest a {{plain|[http://bfy.tw/E0qa nuclear option]}}: to consider ToaFreak's statement as hearsay unless shown to the contrary. It is unlike Stephen Loftus' situation cited above and resolves all issues. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  12:38, 19 September 2017 (EDT)