User talk:Spartacus: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by 216.172.135.104 (Talk) to last version by Spartan331) |
||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Is it really necessary for a relatively new article like the Supressor? I thought that since that page is less than a day old, we could just let it be an exception. But if we need to follow that rule to this degree, sure, let's preserve that history log. —[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:silver;">S331</span>]] [[File:Bubbleshieldhud.svg|14px]]<sub>([[User talk:Spartan331|COM]] • [[Special:Contributions/Spartan331|Mission Log]] • [[User profile:Spartan331|Profile]])</sub> 11:35, 16 August 2012 (EDT) | Is it really necessary for a relatively new article like the Supressor? I thought that since that page is less than a day old, we could just let it be an exception. But if we need to follow that rule to this degree, sure, let's preserve that history log. —[[User:Spartan331|<span style="color:silver;">S331</span>]] [[File:Bubbleshieldhud.svg|14px]]<sub>([[User talk:Spartan331|COM]] • [[Special:Contributions/Spartan331|Mission Log]] • [[User profile:Spartan331|Profile]])</sub> 11:35, 16 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:41, August 31, 2012
Userpage
Nice use of the Header template. Clean and simple userpage. :) — subtank 16:40, 13 February 2012 (EST)
- Why thank you. :)--Spartacus Talk • Contribs
- Kind of reminds me of my userpage. :P —S331 (COM • Mission Log • Profile) 04:41, 14 February 2012 (EST)
"Unified" or "United"
Actually, both have been used. Has there been a formal consensus as to which one we should accept as the canon?-- 77.97.158.189 16:07, 22 February 2012 (EST)
- The page itself (Unified Earth Government) is named "Unified". I do believe "Unified is the correct way. The cases where "United" is used I believe to be mistakes, as the novel Glasslands names the President of the UEG as President of the Unified Earth Government.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs
IP range
Not sure if it's already been handled, but those three guys come up with a range of 210.56.80.0/20.-- Forerunner 12:06, 5 March 2012 (EST)
RE: Preview is your friend
Old habits die hard, I'll try and use it more often. Know this however:
- 1. I don't care about my post count.
- 2. Whenever I re-edit something I make it a minor edit so that it doesn't inflate the count that I know you guys care about.
Thanks. -TheLostJedi 21:43, 10 March 2012 (EST)
- It's ok. It was quite ironic when I was editing your talk page though. I phailed.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 21:53, 10 March 2012 (EST)
- Haha. Priceless. xD
- Still, I will try to remember the preview button more often in the future. ;) -TheLostJedi 13:59, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
HotM
Thanks for letting me know. I didn't even know I was nominated! -- Specops306 Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek 16:34, 1 April 2012 (EDT)
Deathmatch
I guess that's because there are people who know CoD terminology better than Halo terminology, and deathmatch is CoD's Slayer. But then again, what are the odds of people searching Deathmatch here for Slayer? Then I realized you might have asked a rhetorical question. Oh well. —S331 (COM • Mission Log • Profile) 10:53, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
- That's what I thought. The weird thing was that the two links to deathmatch were on pages pertaining to Halo Wars. Oh well, thanks.-- Col. Spartacus Talk Page Contributions 14:25, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
RE: Serin Osman
I guess you're right. I was thinking more like "Once a Spartan, always a Spartan", but since she was washed out, and therefore lost the status of a Spartan, she doesn't count. Edit has been reverted. Thanks for remind me. :) —S331 (COM • Mission Log • Profile) 23:23, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
- You're welcome. =)-- Col. Spartacus Talk Page Contributions 23:26, 23 April 2012 (EDT)
Art Book
You are such a freaking idiot...it is the THIRD!
Yeah okay, I'm the idiot. :P I honestly knew it was the fourth and mistook Kronos' edit for changing it to the third. My bad. :P
- It's okay. We all make mistakes. :)-- Col. Spartacus Talk Page Contributions 16:26, 8 May 2012 (EDT)
Would you kindly...
... help me update the implementation of the military infobox in these articles? I've done till SPARTAN-III Gamma Company but don't have the time to do the rest. There's a good 100+ articles to go. :) — subtank 16:39, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
- Sure, I'll get right on it. :)-- KEEP IT CLEAN Comm Line Transmissions 18:42, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
RE:
I know, I messed up. I was trying to find a way to move the Red vs Blue article and rename it with it's proper name with the period. My apologies. —Jamn liciousness 20:55, 19 May 2012 (EDT)
Human.
Your incorrect decision disappoints me, but I shall abide by it for now. Captain J 17:12, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
Sorry i was trying to clean up the Space topic. It appears to be spread across three different topics
Is there a way we can clean the SPace Topics up and consolidate them into one? Survival space flight and the disc topics? RussellofSwinhart 00:24, 24 July 2012 (EDT)
- We have an unwritten rule to not alter/remove talk page content. This is so readers can see older conversations as they were when they were originally written. If we were to put the conversations together, it really wouldn't make sense to people reading it since they were all written separately.--Spartacus (Talk | Contribs) 00:32, 24 July 2012 (EDT)
- I suppose it make sense in a chronological sense but from a content perspective its rather frustrating and inconvenient. But if its a rule i guess I'll leave it. RussellofSwinhart 00:37, 24 July 2012 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks for the help with the coding man, I can be a ditz sometimes. =P --Kluutak 12:44, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
Re: History Logs
Is it really necessary for a relatively new article like the Supressor? I thought that since that page is less than a day old, we could just let it be an exception. But if we need to follow that rule to this degree, sure, let's preserve that history log. —S331 (COM • Mission Log • Profile) 11:35, 16 August 2012 (EDT)